Technology

59111 readers

3264 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

493

AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted, rules a US Federal Judge (www.theverge.com)

submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

AI-generated art cannot be copyrighted, rules a US Federal Judge::United States District Court Judge Beryl A. Howell found that AI-generated artwork can’t be copyrighted, putting to rest a lawsuit against the US Copyright Office over its refusal to copyright an AI-generated image.

(page 2) 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

ai and copyright can both suck my balls

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

insert copyright is good, change my mind meme

load more comments (6 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] eestileib@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago

Beryl Howell was #2 behind Chutkan in the "take no shit about J6" sweepstakes, so I have a soft spot for her.

I largely agree with her decision, but I feel like it's kind of screwing over all the actual human artists whose work was stolen and incorporated into their models without permission or payment.

I hope somebody whose art was released under the GPL can prove it was used in Stable Diffusion or ChatGPT and sues the fuck out of them.

load more comments