this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
954 points (99.9% liked)

Asklemmy

49777 readers
487 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Let's get the AMAs kicked off on Lemmy, shall we.

Almost ten years ago now, I wrote RFC 7168, "Hypertext Coffeepot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances" which extends HTCPCP to handle tea brewing. Both Coffeepot Control Protocol and the tea-brewing extension are joke Internet Standards, and were released on Apr 1st (1998 and 2014). You may be familiar with HTTP error 418, "I'm a teapot"; this comes from the 1998 standard.

I'm giving a talk on the history of HTTP and HTCPCP at the WeAreDevelopers World Congress in Berlin later this month, and I need an FAQ section; AMA about the Internet and HTTP. Let's try this out!

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] GlitchyDigiBun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[โ€“] brad@toad.work 8 points 2 years ago

No question, I just want to thank you for being the type of person that would do this and thank you again for actually doing it. The world is a fun place. I like it.

[โ€“] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I am interested in writing a real RFC, what kind of mailing list etc should I join in order to make my RFC real?

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] where_am_i@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How do I know the government isn't spying on me, cuz they could totally go and compromise all root certificates, thus RIP https.

Oh, and pardon, who the heck does still use http without the s?

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] hughperman@mander.xyz 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What would be a current version of this April Fool - what technology would you create a standard for, what beverage would you interface it to?

[โ€“] Two9A@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The motivation for HTCPCP-TEA was that HTCPCP didn't cover tea brewing. Off the top of my head, I can't think of any infused hot drinks that aren't coffee or a tea of some kind...

Perhaps we need a homebrew beer request standard. The response lag would be tremendous though.

[โ€“] PlasmaK@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] christophski@feddit.uk 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What code should be used if we are expecting something to be a teapot? In this scenario it seems a 4XX is inappropriate because there is no error

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] stardust@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

What are some of your favorite accounts to follow on mastodon?

Also, will your talk be recorded?

[โ€“] Two9A@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

My following list; of note is Lisa Melton, whose bio says "Follow me and I'll fill your timeline with boosts". She ain't lying.

Looks like some of the talks from last year were released on the conference's YouTube, so: hard to say if the recording will be available. I'll (see if I can) remember to ask on the day.

[โ€“] sirnak@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Did you author any other standards and how high is the chance of a proposal being approved if you don't have any accepted proposal yet?

[โ€“] Two9A@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

7168 is my only foray into writing an Internet Standard RFC. If you have a good idea for one, you should definitely get in touch with the RFC Editors; I found them very approachable and willing to work with my idea, moulding it into a document that's compliant to their (admittedly old-timey 60's) documentation standards.

[โ€“] mmagod@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago

I can't say enough how amazing your explanation was. Im not a programmer but I have worked on websites (self taught) and I never knew this. Thank you!

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ