12
Scientists Identify The Optimal Number of Daily Steps For Longevity, And It's Not 10,000
(www.sciencealert.com)
Saved you a click: Per the article it’s closer To 6,000
this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)
Science
18 readers
2 users here now
This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.
founded 2 years ago
Which is what the app on my phone is based on already. I manage it most days easily by walking from the bus station to work and back, which is ~1 mile. And that doesn't include the time I'm actually at work, because I can't wear my smart watch actually in the office.
Not surprising. The 10K steps idea was first set by a Japanese maker of pedometers as a marketing exercise with zero research to back it up.
The pedometers are all so imprecise though that it showing 10k may well be 6k real steps.
6k would be too easy to motivate buying pedometers, I guess.
Damn. Guess I'm gonna die. I really gotta change my routine
You and me both, neighbor.
Causality.
Some people aren't unhealthy because they don't walk enough, they don't walk enough because they're unhealthy or have an underlying condition.
Someone in a coma ain't walking much, but that's not the main reason they're more likely to die sooner rather than later.
I don't understand why they use steps. Who counts steps? It is more individualized than a distance, but my gosh, who is out there saying 4,981, 4,982, ...? I know roughly the distance of my pace and could convert.
It really sounds like we need folks to get out and do it, tho!