this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2024
622 points (87.7% liked)

Gaming

3123 readers
317 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

I guess a solution for both would be to always have an option but would make it harder to craft certain sort of stories.

[–] NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

How about just playing the story as intended. Not everything has to be individualized.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip -2 points 10 months ago (8 children)

I don't see an issue, if 99% of the people are straight, and the goal of your character is to put the players in their shoes, then making them straight (if sexuality is in the game for whatever reason) is the right choice. Btw I'm not straight

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 1 points 10 months ago

As a straight guy, I think I can relate better to a gay woman in an RPG than a straight woman. Romancing men is something that knocks me out of the thing still, more than anything else about playing a woman.

That said, about most games IDGAF. It's not like straight men would not play Tomb Raider because the main protagonist is a woman. And even some RPGs, if the female voice actor is better, or the story makes better sense with a female lead, then that's that.

[–] erin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

God forbid any game doesn't cater exclusively to the greatest size group. Why not have representation in games proportional to the real life people that play them? If all you care about is plurality, then every character should be straight, Han Chinese men. We should cater to the maximum amount of people, right?

[–] NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

I would disagree.

Make that maximum amount of buyers.

It's not party catering. Or art. It's a money business that has to create games that sell, so that the developer can get paid. That is the main goal. If there is room for a message, without alienating buyers, that's also an option.

Anyhow, we have robots, those sell. We have aliens, they sell. We have unidentified that sells. There's elves and orcs, which sell. Bunnies and hedgehogs. Various made-up things. Tons more. They all sell copies. Find a way to make it profitable, and it will happen. It's not about representation. And it never will be. Unless it makes enough money to make more after that.

It's clearly not about diversity. Capitalism isn't about demographics and equal representations.

That lies in demand. Create actual demand, and game developers will follow. They always do.

[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yea pretty much, unless the point is to highlight an aspect of culture like setting your game is Egypt and including Egyptian mythology and history, don't alienate the majority of your audience, introduce them to something different

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Resol@lemmy.world -2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm not trans at all, but sometimes I choose to play as a girl just to make real men mad, such as in laser tag (that's a very obscure TheOdd1sOut reference). The fact that I can't do that in Pokémon Red, Green (the Japan exclusive one), Blue, Yellow, Gold or Silver is kinda silly.

[–] CrayonRosary@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Keep your autogynephiliac Pokémon fantasies to yourself.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I usually choose to play as the girl because devs typically make girl characters have much better customization options or just character designs. Not always but has been a trend i noticed a long time ago.

Like choosing outfits or hairstyles.

Theres usually a lot more options to choose from and also your choices usually are more noticeable when you use your character in game.

Im happy that devs seem to like to give lots of beard styles now so that helps me find more options that i like for male characters

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Agreed.

Also, not enough downvotes.

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I wish all the options were just available to whatever body type you choose instead of being restricted.

Also, forgot to say theres almost never make up choices for male characters. By choosing the female character/bodytype, especially in less fancy games, the way a characters face looks is usually a lot easier to finesse if you dont like the default options you get. And im refering to just basic bone structure/sallowness of face.

A lot of preset male charactures just look lifeless or hungover

[–] MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world -3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Sounds like a pity contest.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›