this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
9 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

19949 readers
60 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] knfrmity@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Private property was a mistake.

[–] Odinkirk@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Yes it was. I think you're getting down voted because people are considering private property with personal property.

Your stuff that's there so you can live your life? Personal property.

Stuff that's held from the common but isn't for the purpose of someone living their life? That's private property.

[–] peter@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

They should stop making really shitty DRM then

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

They could tell me it actually makes games run faster, I'm still not going to buy games with their anti consumer cancer in it (except for the .001% chance I really want to play that game)

[–] dvdnet90@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

the thing that I hate from denuvo is I need to connect to the Internet for the first time just want to play the game which is quite annoying for my Steam Deck.

[–] demonsword@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

even if the glorified rootkit denuvo puts out had 0% impact on game performance it still would be "evil" as it mere existence broadens surface area for potential attacks on your system

[–] notun@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's about the (potential) inconvenience, not how "evil" it is.