18
submitted 10 months ago by Moeaverage@lemmy.world to c/nba@lemmy.world
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] stinkypoopsalot@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

[-] akincisor@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 months ago

They were two games from a championship and it took a game for the ages from Curry to stop them. I think there is a universe where they won one already.

Pat Bev just shit talking as always.

[-] ConditionOverload@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Eh, you can reverse that kind of logic and say the only reason why they were even that close was because of an uncanny collapse by the Warriors at the end of game 1.

[-] Moeaverage@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I think it was an over pay for Brown but it's hard to believe they won't get at least 1 with the right pieces around them

[-] pdxfed@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

He's not wrong that diversity of approaches helps but klay and steph seemed to do ok on the same team so there is always an exception.

I think the bigger issue is whether the east stays weak-ish? Does Miami gas out? Does Milwaukie do anything? Does Cleveland deliver on the promise they showed for most of last season now that they've had the chip put on their shoulder a bit?

Then there is the whole "Western Conference" to think about. Denver isn't coming back weaker with a young team that just won the chip, they'll be hungry as hell to repeat.

Great teams, teams better than these Celtics, have not won a chip, so there is always an element of luck and timing, the question is, can they get their additional role player pieces right and have the timing work with the ebb an flow of other teams? Honestly I feel like the last 4 years they had a great opportunity where if their team was ready and were going to win it, they should have as Golden State was slayable. They definitely shouldn't have lost this year if they were going to ever get over the hump.

[-] Moeaverage@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Great commentary!

[-] Vlhacs@reddthat.com 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

How Brown complement Tatum isn't the question. They're both versatile wings that can do it all on both ends. As long as Tatum is on the court they're fine, and having someone of Brown's caliber is just icing on the cake.

The problem is that the Celtics were hoping that Brown could really take over when Tatum is off the court, but that hasn't been the case so far. Not always anyway, there has been bursts and in general he's still a net positive. Just not the type of net positive you need in a second star.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
18 points (100.0% liked)

NBA

5007 readers
62 users here now

East - Atlantic
Boston Celtics
Brooklyn Nets
New York Knicks
Philadelphia Sixers
Toronto Raptors
East - Central
Chicago Bulls
Cleveland Cavaliers
Detroit Pistons
Indiana Pacers
Milwaukee Bucks
East - Southeast
Atlanta Hawks
Charlotte Hornets
Miami Heat
Orlando Magic
Washington Wizards
West - Northwest
Denver Nuggets
Minnesota Timberwolves
Oklahoma City Thunder
Portland Trailblazers
Utah Jazz
West - Pacific
Golden State Warriors
Los Angeles Clippers
Los Angeles Lakers
Phoenix Suns
Sacramento Kings
West - Southwest
Dallas Mavericks
Houston Rockets
Memphis Grizzlies
New Orleans Pelicans
San Antonio Spurs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS