this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
1890 points (99.9% liked)

Fediverse

35167 readers
428 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Automatically creating a shadow account for everyone on Instagram?

Even allowing people to follow that account?

Sounds like they really wanted to push Threads out the door in a big way.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vera@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Threads isn't "successful", they just happen to own the social graph. Why can't people see this?

[–] arensb@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

In fairness, it's pretty smart, IMHO: one of the big difficulties in getting a social site started is getting a critical mass of people together to sustain conversation. Facebook already has plenty of Instagram users, so giving them all access to Threads seems like a pretty good way to bootstrap Threads.

[–] Lemjukes@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago

Yet another example of meta being extra fucking creepy

[–] Noughmad@programming.dev 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Does anyone remember Google+? When they tried to make everyone with a YouTube account also have a Google+ account.

Spoiler alert: it didn't go well

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sloonark@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago

In other news, Facebook Messenger somehow knows I have a Facebook account!

[–] Ozymati@lemmy.nz 13 points 2 years ago

Is this not basically what google and Microsoft do with their stuff, minus the subscribe even though they aren't there yet bit? It's your meta account, regardless if you're using that particular feature?

[–] Antaeus@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AletheCrow@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

They already advertised this in a way though.

I think one of the links for IG is Threads.instagram.con

That alone made me think they’re going to end up finding a way to merge the two or make them paired.

[–] Kefass@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Copy, paste, succes

[–] quazar@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

i knew accounts were being automatically created and thats why i don't believe the numbers

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AlmightySnoo@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I smell an antitrust lawsuit coming up. Whether we hate Twitter or not, they could have a valid case against Meta here as this shit is anti-competitive as fuck. If Elon is smart enough, and that's a big if, he could seize the opportunity to sue Meta over this and win. To just be able to recycle existing Instagram users gives Meta an unfair advantage over existing microblogging social media platforms.

[–] ignitionnight@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Using an advantage does not mean it's anti competitive.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Debo@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

It’s funny how people continue to think that joining threads is optional.

[–] sneezy@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

Well, it's basically an extension to your insta account. So I imagine when you sign up, it sends requests to others you know to make it seem like everybody uses it.

[–] lfdev@programming.dev 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Of course that's why they had so many new accounts so fast! And that's why removing the Threads account also deletes your Instagram one! No way a bad app like that, missing the basic features (front what I've read in reviews), would have so many users so fast!

[–] ignitionnight@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's no way an app with 2 billion accounts couldn't have 1 percent of it's users take 30 seconds to sign up for a Twitter alternative they've been waiting for? Why is this such a conspiracy to people?

[–] jerdle_lemmy@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Because they really like conspiracies. Meta is only the regular level of evil it was before, it's not a new improved variety of evil.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›