30
submitted 1 year ago by Girlparts@kbin.social to c/tech@kbin.social

Brave will allow users to choose which sites can access local network resources.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] igorlogius@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] ch1cken@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago

ublock origin can already do this btw, don't need an additional browser addon, just tick the "block outsider intrustion into lan" blocklist

[-] ImaginaryFox@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I love Ublock Origin so much. It does so much to make my browsing experience the best.

[-] FreeBooteR69@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Seems like something that should be a default setting.

[-] igorlogius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Makes sense. +1

[-] floppingfish@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

What a great feature! Where would I find that setting on ubock origin?

[-] c0nflux@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

https://i.imgur.com/7xi7wbv.png

Extension settings -> Filter Lists -> Check the box under 'Privacy'

[-] teft@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just stop using Brave and switch to Firefox. Chromium is spyware.

[-] miket@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Chromium is open source, you can inspect the source code and build it yourself. It's not spyware by default.

If you're going to try to get people to switch to Firefox, give them a legit reason.

Also, Firefox itself has telemetry that some would say is spyware. Not to mention, Mozilla has done some sketchy stuff themselves. Recent one is enforcing blocking of extensions on specific domains without user's intervention and picking out their own preferred extensions. (https://lapcatsoftware.com/articles/2023/7/1.html)

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The dumb thing is you could very easily demonstrate the "need" for sites to disable extensions by default by making a proof of concept extension that had normal behavior everywhere else, but was able to identify when it was on a bank site and jack your credentials. It's not a lot of code and there's a reason I'm pretty selective on what I install. It can definitely be done.

Just giving a vague "security" response makes it seem super sketchy.

[-] MoogleMaestro@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I've been using Brave on my Windows install. I think it's OK compared to Firefox, but I can't help but feel like all the UI and terminology is very "crypto" tailored.

Anyway, I think this feature is a good idea. I didn't even realize this was a big problem with modern OSes. Out of curiosity, do port scanning features like this escape application sandboxes? (Like flatpak, docker containers, etc?)

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
30 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

19 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 1 year ago