Speaking of privacy nightmare, I opened this link in a browser with Noscript and there are TWENTY TWO SCRIPTS trying to run on this one page. That is the second worst I have ever seen.
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
39 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
31206 readers
776 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
Chat rooms
-
[Matrix/Element]Dead
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
What a weird way to quantify what’s being run. You could combine all 22 into a single script and the same stuff would be run
Lots of websites seem to be doing it these days. The worst I've seen is CNN, which has over 40 per page.
my adblocker and tracker blocker refused to load the page. it just came up blank. i had to use reader view to see the article, lol.
I find some of the information in the article a little bit misleading when it comes to the GDPR. First, the US is considered an unsafe country into which transferring data, because of reasons such as the Cloud Act. The GDPR simply prescribes that data sharing is possible withing countries that offer guarantees similar to the ones offered by the GDPR. If US doesn't want to offer guarantees of data protection, I don't understand why the limitation should be perceived on the regulator side.
Second, each platform has in any case multiple instances deployed, often each instance is also distributed across regions etc. Painting this as an "engineering nightmare" seems debatable.
I am also not aware of any prescription that forced anybody to run everything in the US with a US company (which therefore is subject to the cloud act). If the companies make these choices, to me it seems natural that they should also take responsibility for them, not complain that known regulations that exist for years forbid you to do stuff...