this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
182 points (100.0% liked)

Antiwork/Work Reform

3 readers
1 users here now

A community for those who want to end work, are curious about ending work, want to get the most out of a work-free life, want more information on anti-work ideas and want personal help with their own jobs/work-related struggles.

Active stats from all instances

Subscribers: 2.9k

Date Created: June 15, 2023

Date Updated: July 17, 2023

Library copied from reddit:
The Anti-Work Library 📚
Essential Reads

Start here! These are probably the most talked-about essays on the topic.

c/Antiwork Rules

Tap or click to expand

1. Server Main Rules

The main rules of the server will be enforced stringently. https://lemmy.fmhy.ml/

2. No spam or reposts + limit off topic comments

Spamming posts will be removed. Reposts will be removed with the exception of a repost becoming the main hub for discussion on that topic.

Off topic comments that do not pertain to the post at hand may be removed if it is deemed they contribute nothing and/or foster hostility at users. This mostly applies to political and religious debate, but can be applied to other things at the mod’s discretion.

3. Post must have Antiwork/ Work Reform explicitly involved

Post must have Antiwork/Work Reform explicitly involved in some capacity. This can be talking about antiwork, work reform, laws, and ext.

4. Educate don’t attack

No mocking, demeaning, flamebaiting, purposeful antagonizing, trolling, hateful language, false accusation or allegation, or backseat moderating is allowed. Don’t resort to ad hominem attacks against another user or insult other people, examples of violations would be going after the person rather than the stance they take.

If we feel the comment is uncalled for we will remove it. Stay civil and there won’t be problems.

5. No Advertising

Under no circumstance are you allowed to promote or advertise any product or service

6. No factually misleading informationContent that makes claims or implications that can be proven false or misleading will be removed.

7. Headlines

If the title of the post isn’t an original title of the article then the first thing in the body of the post should be an original title written in this format “Original title: {title here}”.

8. Staff Discretion

Staff can take disciplinary action on offenses not listed in the rules when a community member's actions or general conduct creates a negative experience for another player and/or the community.

It is impossible to list every example or variation of the rules. It is also impossible to word everything perfectly. Players are expected to understand the intent of the rules and not attempt to "toe the line" or use loopholes to get around the intent of the rule.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mookulator@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is called the “poverty trap”. Here’s a great book about it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poor_Economics

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yet another comment I wish I could pin. Ty for the suggestion.

[–] mookulator@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some of the most interesting parts of that book discuss this graph, and the debate among economists about whether it’s real (which is ludicrous because of course the poverty trap is real). The graph is interesting though because it shows a level of income that societies should strive to achieve for their citizens, ie the minimum you need to earn to get out of the trap. I don’t thing Esther Duflo (author) touches on it, but the extension of this theory to UBI is clear. Everyone should earn that minimum.

https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-6ce43854da6d1a26da5b33a871fe272d.webp

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

UBI is not the only thing that's very important we also should advocate for UBH (Universal Basic Healthcare).

[–] reverie@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some stay dry and others feel the pain

[–] instamat@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A baby born will die before the sin

[–] JudasOmega2@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Choclit Wayne.

[–] usrtrv@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Similar to the boots theory from the late Sir Terry Pratchett.

The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. ... A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while a poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet.

[–] orientalsniper@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I used to buy 2 pairs of sneakers every year, then I saved a bit to buy a nice pair of Red Wings boots, they lasted me 5 years.

[–] Pandantic@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There are a million ways being poor makes you more poor. Your job doesn't do direct deposit? Well that's a $35/mo maintenance fee at your bank for that. It's insane.

[–] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You gotta find a different bank...or better, a credit union

[–] Pandantic@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I totally agree, but that isn't always an option.

[–] mayonaise_met@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

** I move away from the mic to breathe in

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

*in America

Medical debt is a uniquely American problem. Everything except the dentistry in the UK would cost you nothing, and even that is in part paid for by the NHS.

Land of the free my ass...

[–] Martineski@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Ummm... The post is about a thing that's not unique to america. It says nothing about medical debt. Not saying that it's not a problem but it's not the topic of this post.

[–] Kraftee@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Vanilla snow. Open doors with hot spaghetti o's

[–] DopamineDaydreams@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

The classic Samuel Vimes's Boots Theory of Socioeconomic Unfairness

load more comments
view more: next ›