this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2024
317 points (88.9% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3041 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Does this mean we're stuck with MQA? Or can we still forcibly use FLAC. I was on the lower tier purely to avoid MQA.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 7 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Tidal seems to have decided that there just aren’t enough people willing to pay upward of $20 per month for the highest-possible audio fidelity.

At a high level, it sounds like this new, much simpler subscription model will still include all the perks — high-res FLACs, Dolby Atmos mixes, etc.

Now Tidal is caving and throwing in its large catalog of high-res tracks without demanding extra money on top.

With this move, Tidal could be trying to head off an eventual rollout of the rumored “Supremium” Spotify plan and avoid potential subscriber losses.

Either way, it’s an attempt to remain competitive in the streaming music landscape — or at least to stay relevant.

Tidal laid off 10 percent of its staff in December amid other cuts at parent company Block.


The original article contains 428 words, the summary contains 130 words. Saved 70%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] mellowheat@suppo.fi 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (8 children)

Awesome! I've been enjoying Tidal for a few months now, and now that it's starting to learn what I like, I'm starting to like its recommendations as well.

Here's hoping they keep staying on the relatively good side.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Actually this is a good deal. Curation on tidal is good, meaning they have cool playlists handpicked by people. In the past when I used it it was with questionable MQA encoding, which had a lot of controversy. But 24/192khz flac, If you care about audio quality is a better offer than Qobuz.

Can't go wrong for the price. But I think the main driver should be audio quality. Because FLAC files (esp 24/192khz) can be very data hungry, for those who use it mobile only. So you need to be careful with that. You can use lower sample rates and higher bitrate mp3 as well if my memory serves well. But that defeats a bit the purpose of what Tidal stands for

[–] aleph@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago (7 children)

But 24-bit audio is useless for playback. The difference is literally inaudible. In fact, the application of dynamic range compression during the mixing/mastering process has a far greater impact on perceptible audio quality than sample rate or bitrate does (the placebo effect notwithstanding).

If you care about audio quality, seek out album masters and music that is well-recorded and not dynamically crushed to oblivion. The bitrate isn't really all that important, in the greater scheme of things.

[–] resetbypeer@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I partially agree with you. Yes mixing and mastering is far more important than bitrate. However if I let my gf listen to a identical song both in normal 16/44khz and 24 bit version, she can hear difference. Now is it night and day ? Not always, but subtle Improvement can matter when enjoying music.

[–] aleph@lemm.ee 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Literally the only difference between 16 bit and 24 bit is that the latter has a lower noise floor, which is really only useful for sound production - It doesn't translate to any increase in meaningful detail or dynamic range when dealing with playback.

16-bit was chosen as the defacto standard for CDs and digital music precisely because it contains more than enough dynamic range for human hearing.

Any difference your gf hears is due to the placebo effect rather than any inherent difference in the actual audio.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

Tidal is still around? I'm impressed

[–] li10@feddit.uk 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not surprised, I was fed up with the cost so setup a new account with a Nigerian VPN, only a few pound per month with that method.

Might switch back to a UK account if they make the price more reasonable here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PoliticallyIncorrect@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Maybe I would consider paying for tidal but as I am pirating YT music thought ReVanced I think I wouldn't, so good luck anyway.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›