this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2024
196 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

34520 readers
651 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

As of today, Apple, Alphabet, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft and ByteDance, the six gatekeepers designated by the Commission in September 2023, have to fully comply with all obligations in the Digital Markets Act (DMA).

The DMA aims to make digital markets in the EU more contestable and fairer. It establishes new rules for 10 defined core platform services, such as search engines, online marketplaces, app stores, online advertising and messaging, and gives new rights to European businesses and end-users.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themurphy@lemmy.world 79 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Amazing and terrifying that EU seems to be the only world government to actually stand up against this late stage capitalism dystopia.

These rules actually makes sense. They actually protect both consumers and other companies around the whole world. And most importantly; they tackle a real world problem head on.

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just happen to be that big tech is located in USA.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 months ago

Just happens to be that the US lost citizen's united.

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

that EU seems to be the only world government to actually stand up against this late stage capitalism dystopia

The EU isn't a government, but I'll allow it for now. :P

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It is though. Has a Parliament and like three Presidents. Makes rules that are enforceable across member states (admittedly by proxy mechanisms). It has elections. Even a shared army.

What else does it need to qualify as a government?

[–] TCB13@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Makes rules that are enforceable across member states (admittedly by proxy mechanisms)

Those "proxy mechanisms" make things very different than a typical government. Also not everything that the parliaments says is required to be enforced in member states. A lot of the proposals are recommendations and even the ones that are actually about regulation have to be transposed into member state laws in some way those countries see fit and there's a lot or margin there.

and like three Presidents. (...) It has elections.

There aren't direct elections by the people like in countries, things are a bit more complex: https://elections.europa.eu/en/how-elections-work/

Even a shared army.

No, there isn't. The founding treaties of the EU don't allow for the creation of a European army as the EU is about peaceful economic cooperation and and also a bunch of other reasons.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 1 points 6 months ago

There aren’t direct elections by the people like in countries, things are a bit more complex

It's as complex as most elections in countries that have territory based representation. My local elections are actually more complex than the EU elections. Also for that matter, if I move across the EU to a different country, I have immediate voting rights in municipal elections.

Also not everything that the parliaments says is required to be enforced in member states.

Only regulations. The EU has the power to override national legislatures if it so wishes, and it uses that power regularly, like with the GDPR. The point is it isn't up to the member states to decide what to enforce, the EU decides where it leaves leeway and where it doesn't. In some aspects, that ties member states together tighter than US states, as the US federal govt can't regulate some matters even if it wants without amending the constitution IIRC.

The founding treaties of the EU don’t allow for the creation of a European army

You got me there, the EU does not have a standing shared army, but there is nothing prohibiting it either IIRC. There are EU Battlegroups that can be called up in days which are then under joint EU command, and many member states share military resources. Stuff is trending towards a shared army as well, with the recent merging of Dutch and German armies for example. There is a joint defence and security policy as well, and forces under joint EU command have undertaken dozens of missions across the world.

[–] Hjalamanger@feddit.nu 48 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In case of an infringement, the Commission can impose fines of up to 10% of the company's total worldwide turnover, which can go up to 20% in case of repeated infringement.

Okay, this good! It seams like they've created a (very good) law and also a way to enforce it

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It then goes up to "structural remedies" if there are continuous issues, meaning forced divestments, in plain English breaking them up.

[–] Comradesexual@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 6 months ago (3 children)
[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 17 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Well they do some things right but you know they are also pretty dystopian as well, trying to ban encryption so they can have total surveillance over their citizens like china and what not. Just as bad as the usa in that regard!

Sorta gross.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

trying to ban encryption so they can have total surveillance over their citizens

On the contrary, they are the first to enshrine it as a basic human right. Chat control got shut down so hard not even the EU legislature can pick it up again easily.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yes I'm glad chat control was stopped, but it just goes to show there are wannabe authoritarians in everyone's government.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 1 points 6 months ago

There are wannabe authoritarians everywhere, one of the functions of government is to stop them. Which kinda sorta works in the EU if you don't look too far east.

[–] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee -1 points 6 months ago

Even if something like this passed the majority of EU governments wouldn't adopt it. Like the EU copyright directive, only about 4 countries adopted it. The EU is a trade alliance, not a federal government, it doesn't have the authority override local law unrelated to EU wide trade.

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 4 points 6 months ago

And even their recent ideas of putting PhotoDNA and other encryption mitigating stuff everywhere?

[–] Synthuir@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

When someone literally named Comradesexual@lemmygrad.ml praises the EU…

Brb, gonna go ice skating in Hell!

[–] Comradesexual@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Synthuir@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I’ve seen a few lemmygrad users that aren’t tankies, but by far the majority are extremely opposed to the EU, NATO, etc. Nothing against you personally, just thought it was funny.

[–] Comradesexual@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] Synthuir@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Thank you for being honest and not flaming, I can certainly appreciate that perspective. I must be jaded from seeing people equate the EU and NATO so often.

[–] Comradesexual@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I am very chill. Admittedly, I haven't seen the behaviour you describe, but I am aware of the anti-EU views some have. I am extremely pro EU and wish for it to eventually expand into a pan AfroEuroAsian union, but even with just EU expansion, or even without expansion, they desperately need to address the current voting system within the EU as an organization, AND they desperately need to give vote to Europeans. I appreciate many things they do, but I frequently feel like they'd benefit from having europeans voting on certain issues.

[–] Synthuir@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

See, I can get behind this 100%! Real, actual egalitarian society, and not constant isolationist/factionalist/nationalistic bickering.