this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
1086 points (93.9% liked)

Technology

62782 readers
2959 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Honestly I'd expect a much bigger jump

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 11 months ago

Brave is evil.

[–] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Competition is healthy for a market, this is proof that people aren't happy with the default browser and it'll hopefully spur apple into improving their browser and in turn causing brave to improve even more

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] foremanguy92_@lemmy.ml 6 points 11 months ago

I don't think this is a good thing, brave is good out of the box but do not provide good browsing experience

[–] excitingburp@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And once again, I am seriously questioning Apple's privacy claims. Why else would Apple build such a moat around Safari?

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Because they can limit it and thus make app more attractive and keep a 30% cut?

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Same reasons as Internet Explorer, probably

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›