this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
24 points (81.6% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2211 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The United States House of Representatives is reviewing a bill that calls for a reassessment of the country’s relationship with South Africa, amid tensions between the nations.

...

She speculated that the introduction of the bill might be due to South Africa’s stance on Israel’s war on Gaza and the fact that South Africa brought a genocide case against Israel to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on December 29, 2023.

top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lettruthout@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Seems like the most logical, and humane, thing to do would be to break ties with Israel instead. South Africa is on the right side of history on this one.

[–] taanegl@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

I'm sorry, but principles of liberty are hard. Can't we just have some of it here and there, and other places where it's economically and geopolitically advantagous, we can - y'know, just ignore those? You know the ones, the ones we harp on about every election cycle.

I mean come on! It's not like we're selling out everything we supposedly stand for to play the tepid games of fancy boys and girls who want fatter Cayman island bank accounts, which inadvertently enables ethno-nationalism to rear its ugly head again to commit genocide.. can't we can have a little genocide.. as a treat?

Can't we please just have business as usual?!?! GAH, MOM!!! Principles are hard! I dun wanna :(

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

I'm never going to vote for a single politician who takes AIPAC money again.

This is the result of decades of no standards:

A government where both parties are in the pocket of a legitimately evil fascist in the middle of a genocide.

In the current system we don't have a "no genocide" option, which means it's time for the end of the current two party system.

This isn't going to be the only area this happens. It's already happening with healthcare, taxes, and other topics directly effecting Americans as well.