this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
44 points (94.0% liked)

Star Trek

10608 readers
46 users here now

r/startrek: The Next Generation

Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...

Maybe a little slash fic.


New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?


Rules

1 Be constructiveAll posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.


2 Be welcomingIt is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.


3 Be truthfulAll posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.


4 Be niceIf a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.


5 SpoilersUtilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.


6 Keep on-topicAll submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.


7 MetaQuestions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.


Upcoming Episodes

Date Episode Title
11-14 LD 5x05 "Starbase 80?!"
11-21 LD 5x06 "Of Gods and Angles"
11-28 LD 5x07 "Fully Dilated"
12-05 LD 5x08 "Upper Decks"
12-12 LD 5x09 "Fissue Quest"

Episode Discussion Archive


In Production

Strange New Worlds (2025)

Section 31 (2025-01-24)

Starfleet Academy (TBA)

In Development

Untitled comedy series


Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.


Allied Discord Server


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BeardedSingleMalt@kbin.social 29 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

and likened the tone to the Guardians of the Galaxy movies.

Oh good, a light-hearted romp where half the characters act like idiots, that's exactly what a Star Trek movie about a clandestine blackops organization should be like

[–] Ramin_HAL9001@lemmy.ml 20 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Deep Space Nine made it absolutely clear that Section 31 is an illegal black-ops org with garb somewhat reminiscient of Nazi storm troopers, they were the bad guys.

Yeoh has described it as “Mission: Impossible in space,” and likened the tone to the Guardians of the Galaxy movies.

Mission: Impossible, the longest-running, pro-CIA anti-socialist propaganda series in US history. OK... so now Star Trek is about making illegal black-ops Nazis look cool?

Fuck these fucking producers. I want my gay space communism back.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"Illegal?" DS9's S31 was protected by Starfleet Command. They were completely untouchable.

[–] Ramin_HAL9001@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

"Illegal?" DS9’s S31 was protected by Starfleet Command. They were completely untouchable.

They can be both protected and illegal. Sisko noted that the organization was completely antithetical to the laws of Starfleet, e.g. committing genocide against the Changlings of the Dominion (they used the actual word "genocide" to describe what Section 31 did in the show). But their existence was neither denied nor acknowledged by Starfleet. This is part of the reason why he asked Bashir to act as a double-agent.

It was clearly analogous to the CIA, which for decades has been collecting money from the illegal drug trade and supporting terrorist organizations around the world, all in the name of "national security." It was a critique of the US government, like most of the Star Trek episodes that deal with the moral shades of gray within the laws of Starfleet. It is clear from their political commentary that the shows morality was staunchly anti-fascist.

And this new film on Section 31 completely reversing their former politics and joining with and celebrating the fascists is more than I can stomach.

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If they're nominally illegal, and those responsible for upholding the law are working with them, they're not really illegal at all, are they?

[–] Ramin_HAL9001@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

they’re not really illegal at all, are they?

If a police officer commits murder but the D.A. covers it up and the officer is never charged with a crime, does this make murder by the police legal?

Yes, it is illegal, and the government does not enforce laws consistently. The point is, this is a moral failing of Starfleet/the US government. This is an injustice.

[–] TheFerrango@lemmy.basedcount.com 1 points 7 months ago

S31 was right though, the Founders should’ve been exterminated

[–] wingsfortheirsmiles@feddit.uk 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I'd personally prefer that to the tone Discovery took

[–] theinspectorst@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That was my thought, I'm quite up for this. I enjoyed The Voyage Home, I enjoyed The Trouble with Tribbles - I wouldn't want all Trek to be like that but there is absolutely a place in the franchise for light-hearted takes on Trek.

[–] melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago

I have nothing wrong with lighthearted takes on Trek, but choosing to make the movie about "fascist space emperor joins the CIA" lighthearted seems like a dubious choice. I guess we'll see how they portray it but given how Trek has handled S31 so far, I don't want to get my hopes up.

[–] Lydia_K@startrek.website 15 points 7 months ago

Translation: it's another formulaic action film with a Star Trek coat of paint.

[–] criitz@reddthat.com 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We don't want a different trek

We want old trek in a new wrapper

[–] ValueSubtracted@startrek.website 2 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Who's "we," and why are they so excited at the prospect of reheated leftovers?

[–] dumbass@lemy.lol 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I am one of the we.

Because the new food is bland, the leftovers still taste good to my tastebuds.

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca -4 points 7 months ago

It’s pretty good for shit.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 10 points 7 months ago

If I want something other than Star Trek then I will watch something other than Star Trek.

[–] Ramin_HAL9001@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 months ago

I am upvoting this thread for being relevant to the discussion, but man, this article makes me sick. They are completely ruining Star Trek.

[–] porthos@startrek.website 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I really hope this is good, I am actually really excited to see how this turns out, I don’t necessarily have high expectations but also I don’t think there is any reason it has to suck so long as Georghiu isn’t let of the moral hook for being an awful, murderous leader.

Also Michelle Yeoh is great so I am excited fuck it.

[–] beefcat@beehaw.org 7 points 7 months ago (2 children)

it could be 2 hours of michelle yeoh eating kelpians and i would still be entertained

[–] TheFerrango@lemmy.basedcount.com 1 points 7 months ago

10/10 would watch

[–] halm@leminal.space 1 points 7 months ago

That took a quick, dark turn.

[–] knotthatone@lemmy.one 4 points 7 months ago

I will always root for Trek to succeed. I'm hoping that by including Rachel Garrett, this isn't too timey-wimey and we get a well written TUC-TNG lost era story.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 3 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Do the people who make Star Trek these days just... Hate star trek?

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

There is some really good Star Trek these days. Just not all of it. And this probably won‘t be…

[–] darkphotonstudio@beehaw.org -1 points 7 months ago

Yes. There’s a producer, writer, edge-lord guy who got this kind of shit rolling back in the 00s. I don’t remember his name but despite hating ST, he worked on a fair number of shows. I wouldn’t be surprised if he’s still around working on these recent “dark and gritty” Trek shows.

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

That's what we were all clamoring for: a different Star Trek. Heavens know that has never been tried before!

[–] USSBurritoTruck@startrek.website 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I hate it when Trek tries anything new. Like, imagine if they set a show on a space station and not a starship, had the characters embroiled with the local politics of the same culture over the entire series, and tried to tell a more serialized story? #NotMyTrek

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 2 points 7 months ago

Exactly brother. We don't want no stinky Babylon 5 knockoff in our Star Trek!

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

„Different“ as in „shitty“?

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You wouldn't know this Trek, she doesn't go to our school.