230
submitted 11 months ago by cyu@sh.itjust.works to c/moviesandtv@lemmy.film

cross-posted from: https://sh.itjust.works/post/1162068

There's a lot of ways to lose their house. You wish that on people, you wish that families starve while you're making 27 fucking million dollars a year. Be careful motherfucker, be really careful.

top 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] blazera@kbin.social 69 points 11 months ago

love the call out that they dont create anything. tired of money giving evil old fucks creative ownership

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social 22 points 11 months ago

I've been calling them WORMs for about a year. White, old, rich, men. See the republican party as well lol.

[-] Evoke3626@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This is retarded and we should not be congratulating this person on this racist behavior. Shitty evil rich people exist from both genders and from all races and ethnicities, and have now for 30+ years. This might’ve been true back in the day with no women’s rights or no minority rights but it’s not now.

[-] blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Evoke3626

This is retarded and we should not be congratulating this person on this racist behavior. Shitty evil rich people exist from both genders and from all races and ethnicities, and have now for 30+ years. This might’ve been true back in the day with no women’s rights or no minority rights but it’s not now.

Bigoted, racist, and throwing out no such thing as white men still being disproportionately in power dog whistles...

But look at alllll these outliers! Just because 73% of millionaires were white in 2013 doesn't mean 8% weren't black, Asian, or Hispanic! We're ina post-Racist power hungry oligarch era now!

https://www.statista.com/statistics/300528/us-millionaires-race-ethnicity/

Out of 724 billionaires... 7 are black. So less than 1% when this article came out.

https://afrotech.com/black-billionaires-america

I know you're a troll, but c'mon lol. Be better.

[-] Evoke3626@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

It’s unhealthy to assume everyone on the internet is a troll. If you’re trying to make a point via my username, it’s randomly generated from a password manager and entirely irrelevant.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one 2 points 11 months ago

That's pretty good. Though maybe 'wyrm' is more accurate, since they hoard wealth and destroy everything else.

[-] Kiosade@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

I doubt too many white young rich men are in CEO positions (some sure, but not the majority)

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one 2 points 11 months ago

No, but their trust funds are bad enough.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 14 points 11 months ago

The real irony about the AI controversy is that I could see AI replacing the studio execs long before it can replace the creative people.

An AI compare scripts to existing scripts that are popular. Send the scripts to actors and directors based on similarity to the work they've done before. If there's enough popular actors agreeing to work on the project and if it's part of an existing popular franchise, green light it.

Of course having AI do the jobs of studio execs would mean we'd have a lot of big budget movies that are kinda unoriginal and a lot of typecasting. But that's exactly what we have now.

AI could easily do the job of a studio exec.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

money giving evil old fucks creative ownership

The creator sells the ownership rights. That's how they get paid if they don't produce it themselves.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 43 points 11 months ago

Right, because they need things like food and house. And some guy that was born rich provides that money, so that theyll make even more money for no other reason than they already had money. To buy ownership of more money making ideas they didnt come up with.

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.one 36 points 11 months ago

If I saw Ron Perlman kill someone, I would assume it was for a good reason. And then provide him with an alibi.

[-] Tolstoshev@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago

They should send him to the negotiation table. Just sit there and stare at the execs on the other side.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 24 points 11 months ago

Holy shit. I wouldn't want Ron Perlman out to get me, he's one scary MF.

[-] freamon@feddit.nl 14 points 11 months ago

If it really was him, then along with the "it's very disturbing" public comment, Bob Iger seems to have lost his knack for negotiating.

[-] wheresbicki@midwest.social 6 points 11 months ago

Bob Iger is a jackass who got greedy coming back to Disney and expected he swoop in and save the day.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one 4 points 11 months ago

I'm all for naming and shaming, but what's the evidence it was Iger? I'm not doubting it, just would rather have the receipts if they exist.

[-] freamon@feddit.nl 9 points 11 months ago

Perlman specifically mentions $27 million, and it's known that Iger's deal with Disney was for $54 over over 2 years. Maybe he's not the only CEO earning that, but he's the one that most people would associate with that figure.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one 1 points 11 months ago

Okay, so it's pretty clear Iger is who Perlman is hinting at, but is there solid reason to believe Iger was the quoted exec? That vile sentiment could have come from any number of bastards at the top.

[-] freamon@feddit.nl 2 points 11 months ago

Only that Perlman is saying "we all know who it is", which suggests there aren't other candidates up for debate as for who it could be.
During previous strikes, I think it was relatively small groups of men who actually got the negotiating done on the AMPTP's behalf, rather than the AMPTP itself. Iger was a part of those groups in the past, so maybe that's another reason.

[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 11 points 11 months ago

Why do people continue to say stupid things on public forums? I understand the feeling, I don’t understand the posting.

[-] exohuman@programming.dev 61 points 11 months ago

He seems very angry and I understand why. I agree with him actually. My guess is that he believes the strong language threatening homelessness to people deserves strong language demanding class action back.

[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 3 points 11 months ago

Yes, I totally agree with him, there are just better ways to get his point across.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

More effective ways? Maybe. More diplomatic ways? Definitely. Better ways? I don’t think so.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one 5 points 11 months ago

Like what? Would anyone be talking about it if he was more gentle?

[-] dedale@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

He publicly threatened to set their houses on fire, that's not a smart thing to do.

[-] Pips@lemmy.film 23 points 11 months ago

They publicly threatened to make writers and actors homeless. He's just being more direct about it.

[-] dedale@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

He's very right to be angry. He's also incriminating himself.

[-] ABCDE@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago
[-] o0joshua0o@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

It's like a mafia threat. It's definitely implied, but still ambiguous enough that it would be hard to press charges based on that alone.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one 6 points 11 months ago

He didn't, not really. As he clarified, it was only an expression of frustration and a warning to execs that saying shit like that can lead to a type of escalation that neither side really wants.

[-] dedale@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah it's human.
Hope they don't use it as an excuse to attack him. You don't often get the benefit of the doubt these days.

[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 36 points 11 months ago

It's very unclear from the quoting here, but he's responding to an anonymous executive who said they should just drag out negotiations until they start losing homes to force them into a deal. So Perlman is defending the good folks here.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago

When I was on twitter, I followed less than 10 people. But Ron Perlman was one of those that I followed.

Dude's always saying things that are exactly the kinds of things you'd expect Ron Perlman to say.

[-] clearleaf@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

And the person who said it is who exactly?

[-] drhandsome@lemmy.film 3 points 11 months ago

I had no idea he was a New Yorker! This is such a New York accent.

[-] LazaroFilm@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Now who in the industry made $27m?…@cyu

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
230 points (100.0% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

41 readers
1 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [!thebear@lemmy.film](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: !entertainment@beehaw.org !moviesuggestions@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS