this post was submitted on 26 Apr 2024
833 points (97.6% liked)

Open Source

31272 readers
585 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DogWater@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Is this useful for hobbyists besides poking around and seeking the design philosophy at work back then?

Like would there be any advantage or reason to implement this in a home project? For example maybe that it's lightweight and has some rare compatibility or anything like that?

[–] bigredcar@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are a lot of decades old embedded systems out there. Every so often you hear about a big company still relying on floppy disks and other old tech, including major railways and airplane companies. Having the source code will help with debugging better than having to disassemble or other reverse engineering.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

MS-DOS 1.25, 2.0 were release years ago, your title should specify 4.0

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] mac@infosec.pub 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

That page is full of pop-ups.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HowMany@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago

Wake me when they release DOS 6.x source code.

[–] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 6 points 6 months ago

Ah, the Quick and Dirty Operating System.... we meet again.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Did they use source control of any kind back then?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Murdoc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

~~So not 3? Why not, because it was the most successful or something? 🤷~~

~~Plus I never even heard of 4 before. I'm going to have to look that up.~~

Bah, I was thinking of windows. I need to get some sleep.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

As far as Windows goes, 95 was actually version 4.00.950 for the first version.

98 was 4.1, 2000 was 5.0, XP 5.1, Vista 6.0, 7 was 6.1, 8 was 6.2, 8.1 = 6.3

Then they jumped to 10 in both the name and internal version.

Windows 11 is still 10.0.x though.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›