this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
221 points (97.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

6638 readers
1014 users here now

A community for your defence shitposting needs

Rules

1. Be niceDo not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.

2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes

If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Low-hanging fruit such as random Twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Matrix chat.

3. Content must be relevant

Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.

4. No racism / hatespeech

No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.

5. No politics

We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.

6. No seriousposting

We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.

7. No classified material

Classified ‘western’ information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.

8. Source artwork

If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.

9. No low-effort posts

No egregiously low effort posts. E.g. screenshots, recent reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Matrix chat instead.

10. Don't get us banned

No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.

11. No misinformation

NCD exists to make fun of misinformation, not to spread it. Make outlandish claims, but if your take doesn’t show signs of satire or exaggeration it will be removed. Misleading content may result in a ban. Regardless of source, don’t post obvious propaganda or fake news. Double-check facts and don't be an idiot.


Join our Matrix chatroom


Other communities you may be interested in


Banner made by u/Fertility18

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FocusFire@lemm.ee 57 points 6 months ago (2 children)

A 1980s modernization lead to the Iowa class actually being equipped with some modern toys too

Sensors

  • Mark 13 fire control radar
  • Mark 25 fire control radar
  • AN/SPS-49
  • AN/SPS-67

Electronic Warfare and Decoys

  • AN/SLQ-32(V)3 electronic warfare system
  • AN/SLQ-25 Nixie acoustic decoy
  • Mark 36 SRBOC chaff rockets

Armament

  • 9 × 16 in/50 cal guns (3 Mounts x3)
  • 12 × 5 in/38 cal guns (6 Mounts x2)
  • 32 × BGM-109 Tomahawk launchers (8 Launchers x4)
  • 16 × RGM-84 Harpoon launchers (4 Mounts x4)
  • 4 × 20 mm Phalanx CIWS

and 5 UAVs

https://wikipedia.org/wiki/Iowa-class_battleship

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Can you imagine if they had gone further, and replaced the aft main battery with a bunch of Mk 41 VLS?

Dunkerque on the streets, Arleigh Burke in the sheets 😍

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, very nice, but hear me out: What if all that but also railguns?

[–] DigitalTraveler42@lemmy.world 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Railgun tech isn't there yet, the bottleneck is currently what's bottlenecking a lot of higher tech, and that bottleneck is energy generation, storage, and consumption, so that's why we don't see more railgun and laser based tech.

[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 24 points 6 months ago

You're quite right, but this forum is for non-credible ideas, and we need something to counter the T-59.

[–] Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Gatling railgun, only 1/6 the barrel wear per shot.

[–] Tebbie@lemmy.world 51 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Nothing like throwing a shell the weight of a car at the enemy.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 21 points 6 months ago

But the car has GPS

[–] audin@lemm.ee 34 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It’s not “outdated” materiel if the entire arsenal of your opponent is outdated.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 36 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's not outdated if it still makes your enemy's stuff go boom.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 21 points 6 months ago

Not outdated if the enemy can't hit it back.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

80's tech in Ukraine be like:

My brother in Christ I've seen MAXIM GUNS in use in Ukraine