If he was a tighter it'd be a different story
5wim
joined 10 months ago
He typed "a gold sign that says D.O.G.E" and you know it(.)(.)
People are so bad at punctuation now. Idiots like this just perpetuate it. Where's the last period on your acronym? It's even more cringe as a result.
... that is there question.
Can you remember the first time you felt insecure about your ability to come up with backstories? What was that like? And so on
Would you say what you're seeking is "more intimacy," up to, potentially, the most possible intimacy?
I would suggest looking at his different interests and getting curious. If you're interested in the guy, it should be pretty easy to find reasons why this film or that game are endearingly-this-or-that in a way that makes you like and respect him even more.
Then, you bond over it; by trusting his taste (intimacy) enough to check out that show or whatever interest, you now have an opportunity to get deep (intimacy) into what you each individually felt (intimacy) about it, and maybe you felt something in common. That's some foundation for intimacy.
I'm pretty sure I only said it was wrong.
Not only is "common" unfortunately not a quantitative assertion (and I disagree), many incorrect usages are "common."
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_shake
As earlier stated, obviously some people might use the opposite words for a particular effect.
It's just not the accepted and used English for those actions. If it was something like "rotated" then it would be ambiguous and subject to interpretation, but the word "shook" already has a meaning
And their point is that they are wrong to do so.
100%
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
My I's are up here ^