ITT: a lot of "either/or"
I'm not sure that evolution cares one wit about any of our theories. If it means I'm the dad and I'm the dad more often... then it will be favored.
If I enjoy it more, she enjoys it more or it means that my sperm have increased likelihood of winning... that's all that matters.
And when I say "or" above, it can include any of those things. It need not be exclusive.
They have no heart or soul, only brief flickers of "try" followed by "squirrel!"
It was their fiduciary responsibility, wasn't it?
The shareholders weren't going to get a better offer.
No. It was alpha. If Google approves, look for excitement tomorrow.
I can accept a day or two of delay if I get a functional app for lemmy. I miss Sync so much...
China can have a near vertical climb in production (your chart) but no one else can?
The vertical change takes planning and time, but no one has a lock on it. Especially if it becomes a strategic resource (and it has).
Jesus you're prolific and ubiquitous.
You win the glib trophy on this branch. Not them.
You really need to check yourself. You are galvanizing people into positions you want them to move off of. Are you doing this on purpose?
He's often taught as a pacifist who did great things.
Reality is he saw deeper and was helped by historical context (example: the presence of Malcolm x and his followers).
Quotes like above are gaining notice in recent years and I welcome it.
All systems require a check on greed and something that pulls things back to balanced. What we have (in the US) right now isn't it.
SCOTUS has not helped in the least.
We need incentives for participation because "the feels" isn't enough to motivate most to work all that much. But we need taxes and laws to keep things from skewing like they have.
With the country built into the community name. Less confusion and wasted energy that way.
I think getting actionable advice was the point of the thread.
Editorials are often seen as disrespectful and dont get the engagement you'd hope (this isn't a news community).
The guy who won "over a billion" (that's not what he got to keep) has headlines with his full name, what real estate he's bought, lawsuits brought against him and he's had to get body guards.
Because california forces a person to claim it and anonymity isn't allowed.
Would Biden break an Occupy like Obama did?