A_A

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] A_A@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What is the source of these gravitational waves?

in my post there is a link for a powerful source of these waves but any source is good enough.

How would rogue gravitational waves create matter?

Here I use an analogy with the waves in the ocean that were discovered to create very strong unexpected phenomenas. When a field is strong enough it can create matter. So, it would be something similar to Hawking radiation or creation of electron positron pairs from gamma rays.

What do you mean by “net zero energy”?

I was most impressed by a single fact of physics that all energy in ordinary matter is equal to the negative potential gravitational energy of that matter.

How would this [creation of matter and gravitational fields] increase the expansion of the universe?

I read somewhere, maybe quantum gravity theories, where one creates the other, so I would have to search it again, unless someone here can help me.

(...) black body CMB?

Please notice that inside another comment in this post I have addressed that question.

[–] A_A@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Whoops, I was updating my comment while you were responding to it. My edit answered your question ?
Also : "3d interference pattern of gravitational waves would create rogue waves." But, what I mean by "if self coherent" is simply the question : is my model self-coherent.

[–] A_A@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@count_of_monte_carlo@lemmy.world

I might be missing something, but how would this new model reproduce the CMB? The cosmic microwave background is a black body spectrum with an extremely uniform temperature in all directions. The localized fluctuations in temperature are only a very small shift to the average.

By the integration over an exponentially expanding universe of the fluke electromagnetic radiation created locally. Maybe matter is created as neutrons that decays into hydrogen atoms which would then radiate something.

[–] A_A@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@FelipeFelop@discuss.online

Agreed, this is the most on topic post we’ve had for a while.

We both think my post was on topic, unfortunately, ShowerThoughts moderators deleted it !

Generally, conservation of energy applies in a closed system, so [it] wouldn’t apply at the creation of the system.

Plus we can’t (yet) be sure what caused the Big Bang if it happened.

Nice 😊 !

I’ve always liked the idea that matter, space and time are the way we observe the interactions of fields. So gravity waves make an interesting idea as to how part of it might work

Now we need a physicist and a mathematician, which obviously, I am not.

[–] A_A@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

@PinkOwls@feddit.de

You might be interested in Dirac large numbers hypothesis, where the mass of the universe depends on the age of the universe. That kind of [ideas] would be a hint for matter being continually created.

Thanks, I will read into it.

[–] A_A@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

@Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works

Oh nice, thanks for the link. Not usually the kind of thing I expect in a shower thoughts community

Since the post was erased I don't know what link it was... maybe it's the one about the Penrose process ?
(energy extraction from a rotating black hole)

[–] A_A@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

@qjkxbmwvz@lemmy.sdf.org

This was a popular theory at one point: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steady-state_model

There was no expansion in the steady state model while, in this new model, it's easier to explain the perfect black body curve of the CMB.

In addition to CMB being tough to explain, the distant universe is different — for example, quasars are far away/old. You would expect them to be more evenly distributed in a steady-state theory.

The universe I propose is very old, so, it is not uniform.

[–] A_A@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@Jeredin@lemm.ee

Interesting idea. And the so-called “Dark Energy” also results from the rogue waves or perhaps another process?

There is no need for dark energy since this is at net zero energy.
N.B. : this is a continuation of this post :
https://lemmy.ca/post/3510924

[–] A_A@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Please join me here :
https://lemmy.ca/post/3553583 for a continuation.

[–] A_A@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Those black holes allow the Penrose process which is somewhat similar to what I am talking about here.

[–] A_A@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I often think about this in the shower

P.S. : Also, i just read the rules and I believe I follow them

[–] A_A@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The original Big Bang also violates conservation of energy.
For the moment this is just a shower thought. More work would have to be done along these lines.

view more: ‹ prev next ›