Both candidates suck. Nobody wants to watch them.
I value free time very highly and a 9-5 job that doesn't demand constant OT results in a nice work-life balance, IMO. I personally found the transition very pleasant. Main negative was getting time off for chores that must be done during work hours. But, many places are pretty chill about that.
The Government’s theory would also criminalize a broad swath of prosaic conduct, exposing activists and lobbyist to decades in prison...And the Government’s interpretation would give prosecutors broad discretion to seek a 20-year maximum sentence for acts Congress saw fit to punish with far shorter sentences.
From the decision.
In short, the prosecutor used a non-applicable charge against this individual. The case was remanded back to lower courts to continue.
That grad hit was particularly spicy.
And always nice to see a train hit. See those less often, but they are Russia's logistics backbone and are some of the most important targets.
Yeah, this could prove very effective. Lancets have been doing quite a bit of damage due to their longer range. If Ukraine can shoot these down reliably with such cheap munitions, it will greatly diminish Russia's ability to hit targets behind the front.
Or Biden is showing his age and needs to let someone else take the helm. Being left doesn't mean yes-manning everything the party does.
Sunless Skies was pretty well made. Certainly a niche game, but a quite well made one.
Toss-bombing always looks cool, but has had very little application before this war. With dumb bombs it's inaccurate, and with precision bombs countries like America gain air supremacy and fly high and drop from level flight. The Hammer is well suited for contested environments in this war as it gives much more range when lobbed from low altitude as it's rocket assisted.
Target selection for them will be interesting. They have a higher payload than something like a GMLRS round, so the Hammers are likely to be primarily used against buildings with troops or supplies, as we see in this video.
Yeah, during those reviews they are going to get their liquor license renewed. Why? Because those businesses have not abused their liquor licenses and have followed all appropriate laws.
The article sites a law that licenses cannot be issued to those convicted of 'a crime involving moral turpitude', but then does not follow up by demonstrating the license is being issued to Trump. It merely claims he would benefit from it being issued to the business. The law quoted does not state it can't be issued to person x if some other person would benefit who has been convicted of such a rime.