CrystalEYE

joined 1 year ago
[–] CrystalEYE@kbin.social 4 points 6 months ago

@Phen True, Roger Rabbit would be so much better without her. :D

[–] CrystalEYE@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

Well, 4x10h are not more than 10h a day, right? And if it is 4x9,25h (37h week), then you even are able to do 0,75h overtime per day, still within the bounds of law. At least that was my understanding.

[–] CrystalEYE@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

@UndulyUnruly Oh, you are right on the commuting part. I did not think about that.
Not so sure about the "time with family" argument, though. If I had to work 10h days I would not see my kids when I come home for 4 days. Now I see them every evening. Sure, on the other hand you get 3 WHOLE days to spend with them.
Guess it comes down to personal preference. :)

edit: But the idea behind the 4 day week after all is 4 x 8h, not 4x 10h. Because otherwise the productivity would not increase. And the article clearly states that this is the main goal.

@alphacyberranger

[–] CrystalEYE@kbin.social 22 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Gab es in den letzten Jahren eigentlich überhaupt irgendeinen Vorschlag anderer Parteien, den die FDP nicht blockiert oder zumindest versucht hat abzuwehren?

[–] CrystalEYE@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago (5 children)

@alphacyberranger Most "4 day week" offers that I read so far just spread out 40 hours of work to 4 days x 10h instead of 5 days x 8h. I don't see the point in that and I do not think that is what this study intended. :)

[–] CrystalEYE@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

@Tristaniopsis I just wanted to generate some Bikini-wearing Pauline Hanson just for you. But when I looked for fitting source material, I found her in panties doing a car wash. Thanks for that. :D

@LineNoise

[–] CrystalEYE@kbin.social 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

@pixxelkick Thank you! This article clearly is written completely biased. Photohops AI generator tries to interpret the whole picture to expand the cropped image. So in case of the original Georgie Purcell photo, the AI sees "woman, tank top, naked shoulders and arms, water in the background", so of course it tries to generate clothing it thinks fitting to wear at seaside or a beach.
I just tried the same with a male model in tank top on a beach and it did not magically put him in a suit, it generated swim wear.
If I use a picture on Georgie Purcell in more formal clothing, it generates more formal cloting.

Georgie Purcell in generated swimwear
Georgie Purcell in generated suit/dress
Male in generated swimwear

But, to be fair, this quote from the article:

But what it proves is that Adobe Photoshop’s systems will suggest women are wearing more revealing clothing than they actually are without any prompting. I did not see the same for men.

is indeed true. In general pictures of women tend to generate more "sexy" output than pictures of men.

And, of course, NINE clearly edited the image badly and could have chosen another generated output with no effort at all.

@LineNoise

[–] CrystalEYE@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

@Tintending Sehr schön, gleich bestellt.

[–] CrystalEYE@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

@JCPhoenix They definitely do! I replayed Sam & Max and DOTT on an emulator for my phone and played the remastered versions of Monkey Island. They are still awesome games.
I want to add "ToonStruck" to this list as well. One of the funniest, weirdest games I ever played.

@bermuda @Davel23

[–] CrystalEYE@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@worfamerryman "We want to have thin phones" is no longer a valid argument manufacturers can come up with when the cameras keep sticking out so much, in my opinion at least.

@wave_walnut

[–] CrystalEYE@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

@smeikx Same with @rollerblading. The sub is pretty big on reddit, but no one is looking for it here, apparently.

@luthis

view more: next ›