Darukhnarn

joined 1 year ago
[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 1 points 3 months ago

So far, „sky“ is pretty nice

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 40 points 3 months ago (3 children)

No. However, the FDP are basically terrorists at this point and will stop at nothing to praise the „Schwarze Null“

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 50 points 3 months ago (31 children)

Im fine with republicans getting the secret detail they deserve.

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 1 points 3 months ago

France has repeatedly tried to hand over shared control of those nukes to Germany. I’d argue that this alliance is set in stone.

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Europe is a nuclear power with second strike capability. „Practically disarmed„ is rather different

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 11 points 4 months ago

Im proposing building guillotines again. Just in case.

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Wie war das? „wie es in den Wald hinein schallt…“ oder so?

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago

It’s an investment? Just like an office building or a company car?

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago

Depends. Is it stable? Does it pose a threat to passer bys ?

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I‘d have to get my tables from work. It highly depends on the species, soil, size, location, age, natural area of the species and so forth. A decently sized oak at around 100-150 years old usually gets weighed in at around 2000€. Variation however is a given.

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 5 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Trees prevent soil erosion, keep water clean, provide the basis for many beneficial insects and so forth and so on. They have a giant value in our financial system.

[–] Darukhnarn@feddit.de 8 points 5 months ago (11 children)

All of these views are valid. A tree has to be seen for what it can provide. If it’s more valuable to society and nature as a tree, leave it be. If other trees can gain from it being removed earlier than its natural decay demands, I’d argue to remove it.

view more: next ›