Darmok and Jalad on the ocean.

I've been using Kagi for two months and I'm loving it - the ability to control your results is amazing. Some things I do:

• remove or downrate things like pinterest and w3schools from my results
• rewrite www.reddit.com/* to old.reddit.com/*
• rewrite to send some sources through archive.today or similar to break paywalls
• rewrite to set the language of some sites that GeoIP my location but ignore my language headers

Also, having keyboard controls - like Google used to have - is so welcome, and their AI summarisation tools are actually useful too.

What's this easy fix then? Just a lower number? That will just mean more publishers.

AI detection tools don't work, and humans aren't much better, unless they're subject experts. How do we stop AI books?

I can only answer the first part: .jxl

Seems like Lemmy should add a rel=canonical link when browsing federated communities - this would “solve“ this issue (and would be the correct thing to do anyway).

socialism confirmed to be effective at the atomic scale, got it.

Toothbrushes were mentioned, and I'd assume that the toothpaste does a good enough job at killing bacteria that it doesn't make a difference, aside from that the bacterial load is probably low enough to be negligible.

But yeah, you don't want to be thinking about putting a pooey stick in your mouth either.

Yes, toothbrushes live uncomfortably close to the loo in my house too.

A friend gave me some light banter about closing the lid = under my wife's thumb but it's absolutely about me attempting to keep the toilet business contained to the toilet!

From the first paragraph:

And best of all, NASA says it will be “ad-free, no cost, and family-friendly”

Looks like you're one of those who just assumes they know what a story's about after glancing at the link title...

I'm really glad they don't! There's so many ways to ask for a link to open in a new tab, but it's much harder to make links open in the same tab once target=_blank is set.

The line breaks haven't worked, here's it formatted correctly:

Explanation: it's mostly due to how js does type conversion.

For the Ls, it's:

• [] is an empty array
• ![] is treated as false
• combining a boolean with the empty array returns "false" as a string (so true + [] = "true", false + [] = "false")
• ! + [] is treated as true
• ! + [] + ! + [] is treated as 2 since true + true = 1 + 1 = 2
• so you have "false"[2], which is l

for the o it's:

• [] is an empty array
• [] + {} returns "[object Object]" as a string ({} + [] returns 0)
• ![] is false
• !![] is true
• +!![] casts it to an integer
• so that part is "[object Object]"[1], which returns "o"-