Oh, 100%, society is underestimating the terrible influence Tate, Peterson, and similar grifters are having on men (especially younger men).
FunderPants
Big tough guy sucker punched an old lady. Trump would be proud if it were possible for him to give a shit about anyone but himself.
Rdrr funny guy.
spoiler
___ The sample problem resolves to 69
Jesus H christ. 800kmh winds that last for weeks. Nothing to do but just die I guess.
Betting markets can be swayed easily by wealth, sure. Another bias is that they're overwhelmingly frequented by young men.
Horrifying, get out and vote and bring as many friends as you can.
Two days from now timelines are going split. I don't know what will happen in both, but I can tell you for sure I'd like to avoid the timeline where Trump wins. If for no other reason than all the bad breath this single choice will cause.
I have to give props to the author for not beating around the bush. "Climate change destroyed Fort MacMurry" is absolutely true, even though most people won't say it.
Even just a panicked 911 call followed by a huge bill you aren't insured against. What a disaster that could be for someone.
You have bested me twice this morning. I am here by retiring for a time to focus on myself.
Even Yellowstone endorses Kamala.
Watching for all caps meltdown from Trump over ELECTION INTERFERENCE
Peterson is bad because he appeals to lonely blue collar millennial men who, if they had positive male role models or better friends, would have a real chance of being actual decent people.
Tate is bad because he appeals to young men and boys who lack the life experience to know the guy is a loser and a grifter.
My opinion anyway.