[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 35 minutes ago

Of course they are, but to suggest the same variables drive a school shooting vs a midnight gas station robbery is silly

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Almost all comments in this chain, and indeed the immediate one you replied to mention "school shooting".

Beyond that, schools and dangerous guns existed before 1980.

Edit even the original meme is about a school shooting

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 3 hours ago

I'm sorry the opportunity to deploy.this joke occurs "often"?

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 7 points 3 hours ago

I feel like I'm back on Reddit lol.

Character accounts making in character, dark humored jokes on an atheism meme sub.

2010 what a time to be alive

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

In general yes but this discussion is a out mass shootings.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Well, disagree but that's fine

I think proving the actual content is present in the song is more challenging, then it gets into the murk of "inspired by/influenced by" etc

In the end, these groups probably did edit literally include the songs in the training set, and are in violation.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago

Agree. I believe I acknowledged that in my last sentence.

My point is a frivolous claim is a thing , and someone bringing a claim must suffice a basic level of evidence to even proceed. Indeed, as you say, "judgement" is at a lower final standard in a civil suit.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 15 points 9 hours ago

If, as one of the quotes stated, they are worried about being "on a precipice", maybe worry about the fact that you are doing tons of construction for games facilities, and athletes and staff are flying in from all over the world.

That massively dwarfs the ac the athletes want, I'm sure by several orders of magnitude.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Well I'm not defending this, but that isn't how crimes are prosecuted, thankfully. Prosecution is obligated to prove their case with evidence.

Like, they have to prove (beyond a reasonable doubt) that you were at the crime scene and committed the act.

Edit Indeed of someone DOES have some sort of evidence you committed the crime and you offer no rebuttal, then you're hosed

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 8 points 15 hours ago

Some people can only pay the minimum, and in certain loans that gets you no closer to paying it off.

This type of principle based trap is a very common issue

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 6 points 15 hours ago

Huh, my read of that was that he's not calling people unwashed masses, himself.

He's describing a system of trillionaire kings and ... Everyone else. Unwashed masses refers to the perspective of the wealthy in that situation.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 11 points 15 hours ago

This comment displays a privileged, ignorant position

1148
submitted 6 months ago by GBU_28@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world

Just seems like everything is "this company did this to their employees" and less about "this novel messaging protocol offers these measured pros and cons." Or similar

And yes, I could post things, but I'm referring to what hits the top, 12h.

Can anyone rec communities with less of a biz and politics and wfh vs in-office vibe?

view more: next ›

GBU_28

joined 1 year ago