Hypotheticals can be interesting but I think they're more interesting when you think about how they would actually work in reality.
Like if someone says "would you give up alcohol forever for £1 million". Surely the interesting part of that question is thinking about how it would work in reality. For example would you be allowed to take the £1 million, invest it, end up with several million, then pay back the original £1 million so you can drink alcohol again?
There's a solution to this problem. Stop using Windows and instead use Linux, or even MacOS.
The thing is that you can't guarantee safety. Things can always go wrong. Perhaps that's why people are cautious about it.
I guess it's personal to different people. Some people don't care about sex and that's fine. Some people want sex, and as long as they do it in an ethical way (e.g. not sexually abusing anybody), that's fine too.
If sex does matter to someone then they might not want to lose that part of themselves. Just like, if you have a certain hobby, you might think "I hope I maintain my interest in this hobby, because it's a key part of who I am".
Sex is important to most organisms. I don't think people want sex just because it's a norm in society. I think they want it due to an instinctive desire. Just like people want to eat food and breathe air.
I think you are right. Somebody who lights themselves on fire could try to ignite other people. The cops are just following their training and trying to make sure that the guy doesn't try to harm others.
And saying the cops are cowardly for this behaviour doesn't really make sense, I don't think. They're thinking the guy could try to hurt others, so they're prepared to stop that.
Well, if we're talking about actual physical violence against people, I don't think advocating for that is a great idea. Especially since, if you try to use violence against people you don't like, they will probably try to use violence against you.
I'm not trying to justify unlimited greed, nor do I mean that we should permit unlimited greed. I'm saying the opposite of that - I think we should have laws to curtail unlimited greed.
But I do still think greed and selfishness are human nature, because when I look at humans, I consistently see selfishness and greed. Maybe this means I'm a pessimist but I think it's just realistic. If humans weren't inherently greedy and selfish then there would be no need for laws that punish theft.
As for whether greed and selfishness have been dominant in human societies... it looks like the rich and powerful in society, throughout history, never gave up their power and wealth unless they were made to do so.
You are wrong. HMD is a Finnish company, not Chinese. Apparently it is largely made up of former Nokia employees.
If you're going to be a smart-arse and say things like "you're welcome", maybe you should check the facts first.
To be fair, he may well have been like that. Humans have been selfish bastards since the dawn of time. And maybe this is why we need good government regulations - because human nature is greed. Any company in a position of power will just leech as much money as they can, if nobody is going to stop them.
I don't think The Sun is trying to convince people to vote Labour, I think they just don't want to be on the losing side, so that's why they're not backing Rishi.
They even say in their piece that they support many of Rishi's policies. Then they reluctantly say "it is time for Labour", which sounds to me like a bitter acceptance that Labour will likely win, rather than them encouraging people to vote for Labour.