Hans5958

joined 1 year ago
[–] Hans5958@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think the problem here is that Veritasium these days now covers popular (possibly overrated) science-y topics rather than actually interesting (but not so popular) science content to stay on the radar. It's about the covered topic, not the quality.

[–] Hans5958@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Better die a hero rather than live long enough as a villian.

[–] Hans5958@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

It's like Reddit, as an link aggregator (Wikipedia said "social news aggregation [...] website"), but federated (in the Fediverse), as in it is not centralized and built upon many instances of Lemmy, not just one centralized website like Reddit.

[–] Hans5958@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think I was able to found the GitHub PR related to this. I think it is a feature so people can search for toots if they turn on "Discoverable". It is now locked before it "devolves into another search feature debate."

https://github.com/mastodon/mastodon/pull/26344

[–] Hans5958@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IDM only does direct downloads, or taking over downloads after waiting the timers or clicking the download button.

You can just give the download URL to JDownloader2, either direct or on a file host, and it will do the job. It supports many file hosts, which may be dealt differently from one to the other, such as needing timeouts, donwloading from folders, handling passwords (it would ask you for it), solving CAPTCHAs (it would also ask you for it), and so much more. Everything would be dealt and you get the file just from the URL you gave it. It's a versatile tool.

[–] Hans5958@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Last time they did with Web 3.0 and it didn't went well

[–] Hans5958@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I don't think this will work. If companies can get away of slapping us by doing "please use Google Chrome or other Chromium-based browsers" just because Google implements the most niche, probably privacy-last, feature ever, then they will get away with it this time, again.

[–] Hans5958@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't see it. Where is it?

[–] Hans5958@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

To be fair, he is right. You would be better to comment on https://lemmy.fmhy.ml/post/584842.

view more: next ›