Incblob

joined 1 year ago
[–] Incblob@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Here's an out of the box suggestion: Dina Remastered II. It's a pixel font, that since it has no curves, scales well on any screen. No sub-pixel nonsense.

[–] Incblob@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I use syncthing without any problems.

[–] Incblob@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I mean it's just the basic hocoro dip pen with a couple of nibs. But I did just order a 3d print of a tiny jar holder for the 2ml jars I keep my ink samples in. Might post that when it arrives.

[–] Incblob@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

At the moment my hocoro dip pen so I can change inks every time :)

[–] Incblob@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Gains for who? If Ai does all the art and books and all the artists are broke, the only ones left are the corporations making money, and the ones selling AI/hardware. The rest are left with generic art, and ironically, innovation in art will stall because Ai cannot innovate.

And it's not being used as a tool, you yourself said that you'll use it instead of paying an artist. As I said, there's already a ton of Ai books being churned out, flooding the market. Are you fine with yourself being replaced by Ai because it's cheaper?

[–] Incblob@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Or you could pay someone... There's a bunch of starting artists who work for cheap. There, saved you $79.5k Sadly your novel won't sell because it's been buried by an avalanche of ai generated books. (amazon recently limited the number of books you can self publish to only five per day... Your argument works both ways, why should I study and practice for years to learn to write my own novel (or pay you) when Ai can just generate it for me?

[–] Incblob@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Look up "loadingreadyrun the summoning" on YouTube. it's crapshot (short comedy skits) Nr 690

[–] Incblob@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, they are run by artists and founded by a pretty famous photographer, so it's more probable that they'll stick to it than, say, a tech billionaire trying to control the world and pump stocks. That could always change of course, but I'd say they are a safer bet than any company built on harvesting data.