Do you think people would like to use bridges built by a company that claims it has built dozens of bridges using "methods that have been scrutinized by reputable engineering firms" but also "cannot be disclosed as that would reveal trade secrets"? No?
I will never understand why public infrastructure IT is not done openly with established methods and (free) software, instead of buying hidden, proprietary boxes that always turn out to have massive flaws.
Do you think people would like to use bridges built by a company that claims it has built dozens of bridges using "methods that have been scrutinized by reputable engineering firms" but also "cannot be disclosed as that would reveal trade secrets"? No?
I will never understand why public infrastructure IT is not done openly with established methods and (free) software, instead of buying hidden, proprietary boxes that always turn out to have massive flaws.