Palkom

joined 1 year ago
[–] Palkom@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I vaguely recall a certain whisky-producing region having some sort of referendum at one point. Must have dreamt it, sorry.

[–] Palkom@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Just to underline what this comment is saying: this type of breakthrough was the wet dream of WW1. The race to the sea, where the western front was established, was based on finding a flank and turning it. That was the objective of most warfare up to that point, and it ended because they ran out of ground on which to turn a flank. Then they couldn't meaningfully break through the defenses (or layers of, to be more accurate), like we see Ukraine doing in Kursk. If they turn the flank, they'll have routing russians for days, and have achieved maneuver warfare again.

[–] Palkom@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It wouldn't surprise one bit me to see Ukrainian veterans training westerners on their own weapon systems when this shit is over. Their experiences will be irreplaceable.

[–] Palkom@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Yoy got it, no buying produce.

[–] Palkom@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

One industry that is really suited for CC is steel production. Making steel from iron is basically removing the carbon from the iron ore, and that has been done since the 1800s by introducing oxygen to the molten iron. This creates a pillar of carbon dioxide from a very localized point and should, if the technology existed and was used, be easy to capture. The Swedish steel manufacturer SSAB accounts for 11% of the national Swedish emissions, and 10% of Finland's. It's not negligible. And steel is used every day, everywhere, and for everything. Every other metal pales in comparison. It's a gigantic industry. And it's perfect for carbon capture.

[–] Palkom@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

Well, you're not exactly contributing to a world where that insecurity is eliminated. And besides, you'll never win an emotional debate with rational arguments.

[–] Palkom@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Found the sandwich speaker.

[–] Palkom@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

One thing about motorcycling is that you tend to end up where you look, and a lot of people crash into oncoming traffic in corners because the focus on the oncoming car and not on getting around the corner.

I get the feeling that this guy tried to veer, and then refocued with all his attention on the truck that was getting closer and closer, and that made it quite impossible for him to evade. He could have saved it by doing a million things, but large and threatening objects that are approaching usually demand our attention. Silly, primeval behavior.

[–] Palkom@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And if he manages to get one off the line, it'll go for 20 meters and then break down due to bearings and bushings being fouled.

[–] Palkom@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is a factory belonging to SKF, a swedish company that produces bearings. Famous for supplying bearings for use in tanks by almost every major power during ww2, and supply to the german side was finally cut off when SKF told the allies that the entire stock was for sale to anyone who paid. I believe the last payment was made by the US 10-15 years ago, finally settling the debt.

Since the war, SKF has grown into a very large supplier of the highest quality bearings, and saying its a factory making parts for weapons is a bit narrow. Bearings are used in most things that have rotating parts, and SKF is large in a lot of markets that aren't weapons. Their product catalogue is well over a thousand pages, for example.

[–] Palkom@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I agree and disagree, I guess. It's sad that so much money is invested in the military industrial complex, but since those weapons are used to fight an opressive and dictatorial regime in favor of democracy, I guess its better. Both Sun Tzu and Clausewitz refer to the use of an army as the continuation of the political process, and democratization of Ukraine is to many a worthy goal, as opposed to the growth of the Russian sphere of influence. Opposing Russia now might lead to a lower overall negative impact than if the same figth is had after Ukraine is annexed and Poland is next in line, but that's just a hypothetical.

[–] Palkom@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Press the X? Gotcha! I'll remove shorts for 30 days or until you come back without cookies in 10 minutes.

view more: next ›