Broadcasting on TV these days is less likely to reach a wide audience than posting on the internet, but a platform is a platform.

Yeah, but it kinda makes him a hypocrite now, don't it?

Let's not forget the prosecutors!

Oh, so war crimes are justified as long as the other side does it first?

This is standard policy for Israel, the same entity that pretends giving people a 'warning' before blowing up their home is a good enough excuse.

The whole idea of the opposition not voting to keep the current Speaker being a "threat to the institution" is so absurd. The entire point of the Speaker of the House is to acknowledge that one group of representatives have decided to vote together on important issues, in other words it's the result of having a majority. If you can't do a simple thing like decide on a leader, are you really a majority?

Sounds like the Dems and the handful of GOP reps that voted to kick out the old Speaker should be treated as the new de facto majority, no?

Almost like it's a bit for entertainment! Being a "jackass" on camera is not at all the same thing as this story.

They know enough to not want to be associated with it.

From the quotes in the article, they didn't just "not disclose" so much as "lied". Regardless of subject matter, when someone cares enough to make sure something they don't want to be associated with isn't involved and then they find out it actually is, they have a right to be upset.

My conservative Catholic family thinks the current Pope is a plant by the liberals, so he must be doing something right in my book.

Oh, but you are also decrying any reaction at all.

Saying something is not acceptable is action.

Every comment here is just "WTF" and that is entirely appropriate. Not really sure what else to say.

I wish I had not read this headline or article.