Strangely enough, in my bubble it is quite descent. People often posting interesting research and advances in the field.
Quereller
joined 1 year ago
Man it is not even HSE. The ethical sourcing of human tissue and the proper documentation of said. And all the bribes for the review and governance committees.
How many bottles do you recommend per day?
;-)
In OSMAnd you can make a map with aerial tiles from bing. You have to configure the map view yourself but it is doable.
Edit: Enable Online maps plugin. Then enable Microsoft Earth as a base or overlay map.
That is about the experience I have. I asked it for factual information in the field I work at. It didn't gave correct answers. Or, it gave working protocols which were strange and would not be successful.
Can this have an influence on the security of certain cryptographic functions?
You know they hit about within a half inch circle at 55 yards. That is with iron sights and the weapon not supported! This is really remarkable. If my top of the head calculation is correct this is about 1 MOA. Better than the hardware error alone of older/ lower end guns.
It is still super boring to watch however.
The rule is you have to hold it single handed. Then everything follows logic, you need to have the arm fully extended to be more stable. You need to keep your eye behind the iron sights. etc. Try it out yourself, extend your arm and see if you can find a more stable position.
No, that is not true, these are fundamentally single shot bolt action rifles. Maybe like a race bike to a normal street bike. The additional precision and adjustability are no use to a normal shooter but they are not more complicated to handle.
Yes, obviously there isn't one cancer, but about every cancer is different. So yeah I give you that. Now, my other argument is you can make the same or more money with one time, possible curative therapies than with live prolonging one. See for example Kymriah. Sure, big and small pharma invest most in development were they can expect a high revenue. Either were there is a big patient population or a small population which have a high medical need. (And therefore are willing to pay a high price).
Do you really think the CEOs of big pharma don't know they themselves have a 20% chance to die of cancer? (Not to speak of their relatives). Would the selfish and rich big pharma company leader not do everything to prevent its early death?
Pfft, should have won gold.