RedKrieg

joined 1 year ago
[–] RedKrieg@lemmy.redkrieg.com 1 points 7 months ago

Has anyone tried a derelict freighter since the update? I just got a star ship engine core instead of a freighter upgrade module :\

[–] RedKrieg@lemmy.redkrieg.com 19 points 10 months ago

I'm guessing this judge considers the telephone to be an example of negligent design as well. After all, the phone company doesn't record every phone call I make and disconnect me if I mention an illegal drug.

[–] RedKrieg@lemmy.redkrieg.com 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Before you go through a bunch of calibration, I'd see if it happens with a different filament. Those black particles there are likely something with a higher melting point than the surrounding PLA, otherwise they'd "smear" during printing. I'm betting you're hitting some intermittent clogs. See if the problem happens with a single color filament.

[–] RedKrieg@lemmy.redkrieg.com 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I like to do things just off the top of the hour, since top of the hour is when many maintenance crons run. If you're running a modern cron daemon, you can rewrite that as:

3 1-23/6 * * * docker container restart lemmy-lemmy-1

https://crontab.guru/#3_1/6___*

[–] RedKrieg@lemmy.redkrieg.com 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't systemd have the ability to do this as well with unix sockets?

[–] RedKrieg@lemmy.redkrieg.com 3 points 10 months ago

I don't recommend using the shell on routers for day-to-day management. Instead, consider using a network configuration management system like rconfig. I've used RANCID in the past, but I suspect something more modern like rconfig will be useful to you.

[–] RedKrieg@lemmy.redkrieg.com 11 points 1 year ago

My city recently did 15mph for neighborhood residential roads and 20mph for the wider through roads connecting to them. I feel much safer now when walking and biking in the neighborhood. The roads here were never intended for cars to be parked up and down both sides.

[–] RedKrieg@lemmy.redkrieg.com 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I hate to argue against you because I agree that nobody needs a hundred round clip or full auto for an intruder, but the forefathers' intended right wasn't "people should have muskets". It was much closer to "the people should be armed in case of tyrrany by their government". The intention was for people to defend their other rights by force, making it more difficult for the government (or an invading force) to take over (this was immediately post-revolution mind you and much of the bill of rights was in direct response to british soldiers' activities). Of course they also thought we'd be reforming the government and drafting new constitutions as the culture changed, but of course that never happened.

I am not a historian, just a pedant.

[–] RedKrieg@lemmy.redkrieg.com -1 points 1 year ago

Non-human entity, please return to your home planet. We don't want you here.

[–] RedKrieg@lemmy.redkrieg.com 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The "prankster" was kicked out by security the day before and was actively avoiding areas with security on the day of the event. It's unreasonable to expect someone being attacked not to defend themselves. It's victim blaming to even imply the shooter did anything wrong here.

[–] RedKrieg@lemmy.redkrieg.com 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're not a reasonable person though, a reasonable person would be afraid of someone approaching babbling incoherently, would back off and tell them to get away, then react with a fight or flight response if they continued to advance. That's what someone relying on their ability to reason things out would do. That's what this guy did. He had a gun, the attacker wouldn't stop advancing when he retreated. He shot. Self defense.

[–] RedKrieg@lemmy.redkrieg.com 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that you're unaware of violent crime that does not involve guns? Lets put the gun aside for a moment and analyze whether or not the guy felt afraid. If someone walks up to you in the manner this guy did, you get afraid. It's WHAT THE PERPETRATOR WANTED THE GUY TO DO! He even said that he kept approaching because the guy wasn't reacting the way he wanted. He was escalating the threat to get a reaction. If the guy didn't have a gun he would have swung instead of shooting when backing away clearly wasn't working. Fight or Flight is called a "reaction" for a reason. It's not a fully conscious process. This "prankster" only did what he did because he was so large and intimidating that he knew he didn't have to fear physical reprisal for his obvious assaults.

view more: next ›