Probably makes sense yeah.
Saarth
This is a long discussion now, and answering everything point by point will be a lengthy exercise.
I'll say this: I believe in a world run by corporate interests, piracy is similar to civil disobedience. If we collectively decide to create friction to the functioning of the system, it can in combination with other ways of resistance influence the situation in our favour.
Not everyone has the option to turn off from certain technologies. My employment requires me to use social media websites (but I can choose to block ads on them)
Piracy of MS office doesn't impact Microsoft much because Microsoft is primarily a cloud and enterprise IT company. For Netflix, Spotify and Disney, piracy would have a meaningful impact. That's why Netflix cracked down on password sharing.
Piracy isn't mutually exclusive with supporting your favourite artists. You can still go to concerts, buy merch, donate or buy physical media. I pirated three of Supergiant's first three video games, and then when I was earning, I bought the games again and played them because of how good they are. Now I buy their games on early access every time.
https://materials.proxyvote.com/Approved/958102/20240923/AR_587276/INDEX.HTML?page=71
This is the financial report 2024 _for Western Digital. Check page 69 (naice)
Cloud revenue 5bn
Client revenue 4bn
Consumer revenues 3bn
I don't see numbers on gross margins but from what I understand about business, B2B divisions usually are higher margins than consumer divisions.
It's like tipping. It's a shitty system and nobody likes ads and tips and it needs to go away.
And your favourite content creator will sell his integrity to any corporation that will put a value on their content. Look at what Linus has become, it's just entertainment and clickbait. No PC builder is learning to make PCs from Linus anymore, he's busy getting clicks on 40,000$ PC that can barely play cyberpunk or potato PC that can play CS Go. Look at the honey scam, even tech expert youtubers promoted scams. I am sure this is just a few examples. Youtubers are just media companies selling ads. You can choose to bypass ads and pay a creator if you like it. But ad & sponsor blocking by default is a morally and ethically valid position and needs to be normalised.
I recently saw Technology Connections guy on Bluesky mention how people have forgotten to curate their online experiences, and in many cases prefer to get media delivered to them in a pre curated form.
Not only does this take away agency, it makes it a less interesting part of the media and consumer journey. Gone are the days of discovering artists on /mu/ or soulseek or mix tapes borrowed from your older sibling. You get what spotify thinks you will like.
Piracy is a great exercise in curation. You have limited space, you only download what you need and like. You most often get better quality. You get to be a part of community.
These are 'soft benefits' that don't necessarily have a monetary upside but can still be a positive experience.
Absolutely. Support small game devs, musicians and film makers. Go to the cinema & concerts more often, buy or donate to artists whenever you can.
But there is little reason to keep your Netflix, Disney and Spotify subscription. Pirate things and pay your favourite artists directly. Tech companies are rent seekers who add no value and give very little back to the creators.
I would assume Bosch knows how blatant paywalling features looks and will backfire just like it did for BMW.
I am guessing Bosch wants to create a Bosch ecosystem where you can control all your home appliances with a single app. This is what PC OEMs did with RGB software. It's not really for surveillance although they do use it to push ads/premium features. The main intent is to lock you into their ecosystem and then you only buy products from them. Samsung & Apple do this are well known for this, and that's what they're emulating.