SickSemper

That sounds like telegram cope? Not an expert on anything

Correa speaks in a difficult way to interpret, I don’t blame you, slowing it down by 5-10% helps for me

Correa makes a funny jab about American presidents smoking weed

Around 10 minutes he brings up the question of a decapitation strike on Venezuela’s leadership and maduro’s response is “doesn’t matter, multipolar world already exists”. A little optimistic imo

14 minutes, Maduro says that Gaza is the end game for all who oppose empire

Some lib shit about how the right wing in Ecuador and Venezuela used to be patriotic and you could get along with them and now they’re traitors (doubt)

And killed their own citizen allegedly

Hezbollah was definitely distinct.

And that’s why I was asking about civilian governments as well, with Yemen. Is war with israel maximum alert all the time for spies and infiltrators and no in person gatherings? Because meeting at hardened locations is fine but if high level politicians can be targeted en route via local informants, I struggle to see a way to maintain face to face contact and not be vulnerable to decapitation

Member of the Supreme Political Council, Mohammed Ali al-Houthi: The entity's announcement that it targeted the Hamas negotiating delegation in Doha is barbaric, terroristic, and an act of aggression under American sponsorship and support.

The stagnation, silence, and lack of practical positions by the regimes and armies of Arab and Islamic countries have produced Zionist arrogance and aggression.

The lack of practical positions by the regimes and armies of these countries has produced the ongoing Zionist crimes in Palestine, Yemen, Iran, and Syria.

Only a practical stance can confront the temporary entity and its supporters in America and Europe and halt their arrogance.

The arrogance and arrogance of the enemy entity and its supporters, America and Europe, will not be erased by the repugnant statements and timid positions of Arab and Islamic countries.

T.me/SABAYEen

I’ve been wondering this since Nasrallah, is the answer just don’t negotiate? Never meet in person? Zoom negotiations forever? If we take Israeli penetration and civilian targeting as a given, does every country at war with israel need to do the same with their civilian government?

[Yemeni] President Al-Mashat: We condemn and denounce the Israeli attack on the headquarters of the Palestinian negotiating delegation in the Qatari capital, Doha.

We affirm Yemen's support for the Islamic Resistance Movement "Hamas" and all jihadist factions.

What happened in Doha proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that there can be no peace or stability in the region with the presence of the Zionist enemy entity.

The Zionist aggression and its blatant statement regarding it, which violates the sovereignty of a sovereign state, sound the alarm bell for all Arab and Islamic countries. Be alert before it's too late.

The Israeli aggression against Doha will be repeated and worse in all countries of the region if they do not unite to confront the Zionist threat.

The Zionist enemy would not have launched this aggression without the permission and green light of the criminal Trump, if not the one who orchestrated it himself.

The United States of America is responsible for what happened, and its role is complicit in the crimes of the Zionist enemy entity.

What the Zionist enemy committed by treacherously targeting the Palestinian negotiating delegation will only strengthen the resistance.

Do not trust America, O Muslims. It is a sponsor and servant of Zionism. Our unity in confronting this enemy is a necessary choice.

To the resistance factions:We in the Republic of Yemen are with you. Our position is your position, our revenge is your revenge, and we will continue to support you until the aggression stops and the siege is lifted.

Difference between distancing himself and actively discouraging its use.

rolling over to Zionist feelings on something irrelevant truly doesn’t bode well for when the rubber meets the road, when it’s actually controversial positions in favor of Palestinian liberation

“I don’t believe it’s the mayors role to police speech” vs “a rabbi told me about restaurant bombings so now I discourage the language”

Both are caving to Zionists but once is passively accepting the framing and the other is pushing it

Nah they’re just defending him here and saying “he already walked back from this position months ago, it’s actually good he’s using Zionist fears of bombings in manhattan to tone police anti-Zionists”

Why do we need to make up a reality where this is somehow not what he sincerely believes?