TechnoAnomie

joined 6 months ago
[–] TechnoAnomie@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

And more than that, I think people who distrust the narrative, but don't see the good struggle against it, including by so many jews, are likely to be indifferent to the blowback. My visceral reaction is certainly to feel that way, before my brain kicks in.

[–] TechnoAnomie@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, not many were paying attention to the loan structures implying there wouldn't be much of an internal change. However, everyone else already has issues competing on interest rates, and I'd think lowering them would entice money to invest on something; the crisis on the core should come when another tech bubble bursts, no? Which America definitely doesn't want.

I miss something often enough, but I think you're overthinking a little.

[–] TechnoAnomie@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

Perhaps. I think the issue is that how money works is counter-intuitive, especially after being used to common nonsense,that simplifications are useful... in a particular context, and they fail in others.

The important point is that money isn't scarce, so all the limitations you're used to exist because of other reasons. I believe that creates an opening for thinking and criticism, even if the American branch prefers thinking you just to fiddle with the numbers to keep the system going.

[–] TechnoAnomie@hexbear.net 22 points 2 weeks ago

And it will still be run by an American. Shouldn't they figure out what the chain of command is for the "European army" is first? I still want to see them argue about what country gets to lead what countries. antelope-popcorn

[–] TechnoAnomie@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

The only savings are the paper, if it's physical money. The consolidated government reduces and increases the total value of reserves when needed either way.

[–] TechnoAnomie@hexbear.net 6 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Double entry book keeping that sums to zero. You can find a better description, but it's something like this:

Government spends first, telling treasury to increase numbers in appropriate accounts. The treasury "withdraws" money from the Fed, which is also the state, creating a deposit from the left pocket to the right, and from the right pocked to the left. When taxes are payed, the treasury can "return" the money, wiping the spending from circulation. If the Fed sells debt, it can only be payed with money on the same currency that was already spent into existence. Loaning also creates money in the form of extra debt, but that debt can only be payed if it is spent into existence.

[–] TechnoAnomie@hexbear.net 33 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Zionism will destroy itself. Even if it somehow killed every single Arab and had all the lebensraum it could want, the death cult would have to feed of their own.

But it's killing its economy faster than that, alienating the vast majority of the world and eviscerating any notion that there any international rules to follow. Good luck to the entire west keeping the treats coming.

[–] TechnoAnomie@hexbear.net 28 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That's anti-sinophism. Buddhists have a right to defend themselves.

[–] TechnoAnomie@hexbear.net 5 points 4 weeks ago

Europe now depends on the US for security, energy and its consumer market.

And food, whenever the bought leftovers of the war join the EU.

[–] TechnoAnomie@hexbear.net 25 points 4 weeks ago

the document’s intent and implications for the election

Who cares; like RICO, Patriot, et all it will be used to stifle dissent soon and forever as soon as it is convenient, whether by a ghoul of team red or one of team blue.

[–] TechnoAnomie@hexbear.net 8 points 4 weeks ago

When I'm not in the nihilist mood, I fully trust the zionist entity to keep searching for collapse of itself.

view more: next ›