TheElectroness

joined 1 year ago
[–] TheElectroness@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, you can probably still get 300 different variants of that on aliexpress for less than $10

[–] TheElectroness@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Sparky, Manjaro, Ubuntu or Debian testing, depending.

[–] TheElectroness@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

google 'google takeout', or just look in your profile, it's in there someplace

edit: the url is literally https://takeout.google.com

[–] TheElectroness@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish more of them would support duckduckgo's bang system, brave seems to, but that's about it. Idealogically I find the idea of using brave troublesome because of a) Eich's transphobia, and b) the cryptobro factor (although I don't think the search page has an embedded miner, at least not from the cursory glance I took

[–] TheElectroness@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

'C3d' could be C* but probably not because it's very esoteric and odd

[–] TheElectroness@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They check the license key hasn't been revoked via a DNS lookup, but not at install time, so often the user installs, uses, then miraculously finds it disabled a few weeks later; then runs to find a new copy/keygen and the whole situation starts again.

(e: they also route the DNS lookup via bonjour if it's running, so you have to keep bonjour segregated from the internet too, which can cause other problems)

[–] TheElectroness@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Sadly, they do license key checking via a DNS lookup, and not all application-level firewalls block DNS.

[–] TheElectroness@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

If you think vim is bad for this, try dte :P

[–] TheElectroness@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Wait, when did they get past 1.4 ? /s

Also, could Oracle/Sun ever get around to not changing the numbering system on a product midway through a product life. I mean, Java 1.21 is great and all, but you know...

[–] TheElectroness@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I assumed, at first, that it was somehow falling through the infinite loop and accidentally runnning the unreachable function, but it clearly explicitly runs it in the assembler generated...

10f4: 48 8d 3d d5 00 00 00  lea    0xd5(%rip),%rdi        # 11d0 <_Z11unreachablev>
10fb: ff 15 b7 2e 00 00     call   *0x2eb7(%rip)        # 3fb8 <__libc_start_main@GLIBC_2.34>

how odd.

edit: ah, it's called from __start, which suggests that main is being elided entirely by the optimiser, and somehow 'unreachable' is simply becoming a defacto 'main'

[–] TheElectroness@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago
[1] + suspended (tty output) vim
view more: next ›