UraniumBlazer

You are getting mad at an internet post by a random person who has exactly zero credibility to begin with. I sourced nothing, I claimed nothing, I didn’t even pretend that any opinion I hold is of value.

Listen... Humans find patterns everywhere they go. That's just how humans work. Your idea is clearly a left wing idea (anti-corporation, breaking monopolies, etc.). I get it. I support this ideology. However, when you call for imprisoning people for life right beside the presentation of this idea, you unknowingly draw up a terrible association to it. Unfortunately, the first thing that people think about when they hear "communism", is "gulags". You unknowingly reinforce people's beliefs regarding this.

All of that pointless stuff aside: Legal ≠ Right I hope you will agree with me on that.

Agreed completely. However, I don't think that the solution for this is undermining law and order. Vigilantism helps nobody. Except for non-democratic systems, violence always leads to your idea being dismissed immediately. Hence, it should be avoided as much as possible (except in cases where you are in immediate danger).

Also: It’s a shitpost. A freaking shitpost. Vote it down and move on. I’d do the same if I didn’t think it would be worth engaging with you.

Words have meanings. Not all people have an advanced sense of humor like you. At least I don't. Sure, if you meant the above as a joke, you should probably have put an "/s" in front of it. This is exactly how the far right does its dog whistling.

A: "Black people something something racist......"

B: "You can't say that bro... That's racist"

A: "It's a shitpost bro! Move on..... People can't take a joke these days....."

Here you go: https://boulderbugle.com/extreme-motivation-course-b8ielm9a

I accept MasterCard, Visa, Bitcoin, your Soul, your common sense, etc.

Solution: Become the better equipment.

You're welcome for the extreme motivation that you just received. This was thanks to the free trial of my "extreme motivation course". To access "full extreme motivation very hardcore", buy my course for just $999.99.

you had to purchase TCP/IP for it from third parties back then.

LOL WAT?!! The precursor to the WinRAR subscription, huh...

And one of the first websites I visited was "the original one" on Tim Barners-Lee's NEXT cube in CERN.

Wow, this is kinda like witnessing the moon landing live, right? That's amazing!

And guess what - there was a network way before the Web. We had chat, "social media" before it was called that, and played online multiplayer games. All without any spam or advertising.

Interesting... Which chat server was this? And what year approximately?

"All I'm asking for, is giving some people life imprisonment for an action that currently is completely legal."

Listen, I'm completely for seizing the means of production and stuff. Google is evil. They can go fuck themselves. However, saying something so incredibly stupid (like you suggested above) voids any credibility that you have.

What a load of crap. What's ur source for this information?

No? There are many other ways to ensure privacy on Android.

1. Best option: Use a Custom ROM (which Graphene OS is an example of). However, going via this route is almost always a headache, as all devices don't have specific, stable builds, etc. Also, going this route poses a very real risk of bricking your device.

2. Easy and safe option (I would recommend this): Buy a device with stock android instead of the crappy MIUI and other variants. Disable all google services and apps and install all your applications from Fdroid. Install a firewall like TC from Fdroid for additional protection.

Lol I first read this as "Redditor" instead of "Realtor" and was absolutely horrified by the power of this one individual to cause damage worth billions.

I was born a decade after Netscape navigator was launched. I'm legally an adult. Wow, you're old!

A compiler has mostly fixed rules for translation.

Some compilers are simple, while some are complicated. An AI compiler would of course be very complicated. However, it still would have "fixed rules". It's just that these rules would be decided by itself. If u r a software dev, u r also an English-to-xyz-language-compiler. You do what your client tells u to do more or less correctly, right? Junior devs do what senior devs tell them to do kinda correctly, right? An AI compiler would be the same thing.

Programming by using the ai as a "compiler" would likely lead to many bugs that will be hard to impossible to trace without knowing the underlying implementation.

Bugs would be likely if your AI compiler was dumb. The probability of bugs would reduce drastically if ur AI compiler was trained more/on better data.

It's ok as an assistant to generate boilerplate code, and warn you about some bugs / issues. Maybe a baseline implementation.

That is the state of AI today. What you are describing are the capabilities of current AI models. However, I cannot see how this is a criticism of the idea of AI compilers themselves.

But by the time you've exactly described what and how you want it you may as well just write some higher level code.

Again. The smarter your model, the more you can abstract your stuff.

Syntax has never really be an issue.

But it has tho.... For example, I do not know rust. I want to add the notifications functionality to Lemmy. Lemmy is in rust. To implement this relatively simply api, I need to learn rust to a degree. Then, I need to look at Lemmy's file structure to understand the project further to actually do what I want to do. What if this all could be abstracted by me simply saying "post xyz to the expo-notifications server whenever someone messages someone." An AI English-to-rust interpreter could easily do this.

The closest thing to plain english programming are legal documents and contracts. As you can see they are horrible to understand but that the only way to correctly specify exactly what you want.

This is what would define the smartness of the AI, wouldn't it? Your project manager doesn't tell you exactly what they want. You have the brains to interpret what they mean and do stuff accordingly, correct?