WereHacker

joined 1 year ago
[–] WereHacker@lemmy.ml 19 points 3 weeks ago

Better save the poor thing.

[–] WereHacker@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Is that the reasoning for bombing civilians to smithereen across the globe if they are under something you see as a dictatorship - they doesn't count?

[–] WereHacker@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Only american lives sadly. The rest of us have always been expendable.

I do feel sorry for the american people. It seems you are gonna get the same treatment as the rest of the worlds underdogs now.

Just hope eXXon doesn't find oil under your house.

[–] WereHacker@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Good to see american nationalism is thriving and well O.o The ruling class does not care about what country we are born in, unless they can profit from it. Borders are meant to keep us apart. Please don't help our masters divide us. We are already out-organized big time as it is.

[–] WereHacker@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

Uhm yes. Is this a trick question?

[–] WereHacker@lemmy.ml 22 points 3 months ago

The "lone gunman" always have the same motive, becoming an anti-hero instead of a looser. It doesn't really matter what went on in their sad little brains before the killing started. Usually it is some coked-up version of a fascist fairytale, but as said, they all have the same motive. Rewriting the story about their sad underdog lives. They are an homage to conservative rebellion against liberalism.

[–] WereHacker@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

I just feel it gets very complicated very very fast. If our military is ordered (by our fairly elected goverment) to attack another country without a reason acceptable to international law, it might be legal here, but illegal in the country being attacked. It might be perfectly reasonably, but that doesn't matter, it is literally political violence, both illegal and legal at the same time. Being against political violence or violent political official acts gets messy faster than you can yell "Saddam had WMDs". I don't know if I am trying to make a point, but I think it is hard to condemn political violence per se, without having a long hard look in the mirror.

[–] WereHacker@lemmy.ml 24 points 3 months ago (6 children)

If politicians decides politically to use the military for violence against anyone or anything, is that political violence? And if yes, does that means there is legal political violence?

[–] WereHacker@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Im pretty sure the average us american thought they were the good guys

[–] WereHacker@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago

Thing is. It was under Biden the US decided we where lucky enough to get american bases on our soil. I really don't see much difference for people in the rest of the world.

I do however believe in democracy. Indirect democracy, where you vote for rulers, must have meaningful choices in order to be democratic.

I guess what I really am trying to say is. The rest of the world don't have a say in who decides if we get trade deals or tanks in the streets.

And if USA was my country I would have a difficult time voting for someone so cruel. Even if he was the lesser evil. Because democracy is built on the notion that you have to believe in free choices.

[–] WereHacker@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago (14 children)

Darn you american liberals are getting desperate. This is a fellow kids-level "please vote for the lesser evil" type of meme. But I am not american and have trouble seeing if your argument is a pipedream worthy of a genocide to pursue.

view more: next ›