He can still appeal, but they can start enforcing the judgment by taking money from his accounts or otherwise seizing assets.

I once saw a slogan on a button at a street vendor in Washington D.C. "Why do we kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong?" It's stuck with me after two decades.

Yeah. How small are they if we turn their ashes into synthetic diamonds?

"That Time I Obliterated my Brother's Body and Spent an Arm and a Leg to Get His Soul Back."

Seems more like a shower thought than a dad joke.

Only thing I thought was a painful cliche in the movie was the "no, I won't kill the villain (after mowing down all of his minions like they were nothing) because I'm the good guy!" trope.

The sons had their wives too.

Still a lotta first cousin fuckin' goin' on though in the next generation.

Yeah, right, "free speech," unless you write a book with two guys kissing, then it must be banned from schools. Or tear up a photo on TV. Or protest wars in the Middle East. Or kneel during the national anthem. They are all for Cancel Culture and silencing people who speak out against them and their ideas.

The only time conservatives actually get up in arms about "free speech," which they don't actually know what it even is, is when they get banned on Twitter for spewing lies and hate. So get out of here with your "supports free speech" nonsense.

It's sad that I legit can't tell if this is real or not.

It's sad that they really can't seem to get away from "guy with the same powers, but evil!" rut for antagonists in superhero movies. And seriously, the "my family makes me strong, not weak!" cliche too?

It's an animated Star Wars series that takes place between the Original trilogy and the Prequel ones, closer to the Original, largely focused on the rise of the Rebel Alliance by following the crew of one Rebel starship.

The ever important safety squint.