amki

joined 1 year ago
[–] amki@feddit.de -1 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Bin ein großer Fan von Hegel,

Da begibst du dich aber in ganz schlechte Gesellschaft.

Kant glaubt, dass „mühsames Lernen oder peinliches Grübeln” alle „Vorzüge” des schönen Geschlechts zerstört. Hegel ist der Meinung, dass Frauen bestenfalls gebildet sein können, aber für die “höheren Wissenschaften” nicht „gemacht” sind. Und für Nietzsche ist etwas mit der Geschlechtlichkeit der Frau nicht in Ordnung, wenn sie „gelehrte Neigungen” hat.

[–] amki@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

This is a core problem of distributed systems though. Signal even cites this as their reason to not federate with anyone.

Once you get decentralization going you need everyone to stay kind of up to date or stuff will just not work.

[–] amki@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It is not. Discord's protocol has been tailormade to suit Discord and the developers will not give a single thought about keeping it stable because only the Discord server&client are meant to use it.

[–] amki@feddit.de 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

An XMPP developer would likely have been delusional about the protocol he himself developed. But at the time I can assure you XMPP was completely irrelevant. AIM/ICQ/MSN/Yahoo! and maybe IRC were the tools of the day back then.

Because of actual competition (which XMPP had absolutely no part in) multi protocol messengers had their golden age then.

[–] amki@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

No.

  • I want to send messages to people who are not currently online (having a server stay online for you is a desparate hack and not a solution)
  • I want to send media other than text
  • I want my messages to be e2ee
  • I want presence - e.g. know if someone is available, busy, away
  • I want voice/video calls

and many more...

None of these were solved by IRC but by the others you mentioned.

[–] amki@feddit.de 2 points 10 months ago

Also Matrix can bridge to XMPP, of course you wouldn't because nobody uses XMPP.

[–] amki@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

No. There was nothing to extend and extinguish with XMPP. It was a dead on arrival protocol that nobody ever used seriously. I've been to the internet at that time and what people actually used was: AIM, ICQ, MSN and possibly even Yahoo!. (IRC for the nerds and Counter-Strike)

It was exactly the other way around. Nobody ever used XMPP, then Google opened federation on their first chat and suddenly someone was actually reachable via XMPP which was a cool thing for some nerds that were into XML then, but when Google noticed that it only imports problems with nothing to gain from the XMPP network they just shut it off.

At the time nobody cared because the people accidentally using XMPP didn't give a shit about it because they used Google not XMPP in the first place.

[–] amki@feddit.de 12 points 10 months ago (5 children)

That's not even true, I run my own mailserver for private and a business and it works like expected.

[–] amki@feddit.de 3 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yet people claim it writes all their programming code...

[–] amki@feddit.de 8 points 11 months ago

The analogy is that you buy a car (because if it breaks, the car and your entertainment stuff, you will buy a new one to replace it, you will also carry all maintenance) but suddenly you can't drive backwards anymore because the manufacturer decided retroactively that you should pay extra for that (possibly in a subscription).

I would say it is your good right then to make your car drive backwards regardless of what it may take.

[–] amki@feddit.de 16 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So sehr mag ich extra3 gar nicht muss ich sagen. quer vom BR finde ich deutlich unterhaltsamer.

view more: next ›