he surely knows the tech. what's concerning is how he's blocking anyone trying to contribute to work on it if it doesn't fit his agenda. very concerning and self centred. a total waste.

unfortunately he's not one of the interesting co-author of the protocol. too self centred.

Yes and that’s their right.

But thankfully they don’t impose anything to anyone. You had me worried for a minute.

of course, but in this situation it's pretty simple. how do you act with the choice given.

they are great conversations about why people are so annoyed by vegans and most of the time it's not because vegans are harassing or pushing their agenda, it's more a question of how we perceive ourself when comparing ourself to others.

it's due to cognitive dissonance.

this argument that non industrial cattle is sustainable is totally moot. please check the literature available.

I'm always amazed about how we use the term "humanly" to express kindness. doesn't seems to fit the actual behaviour of the species indeed.

good meming

I don't deny that. It's just too easy of an excuse to explain what they did, in my opinion.

I don't like the idea to blame a system instead of the people directly responsible for this decision at Reddit. it's like they are victim of it of capitalism and couldn't make another decision.

even under capitalism, Reddit could have found another solution. they could have milked third party app by bringing a slightly unfair price. blaming capitalism is too easy and in my book, often used by individuals to distance themself from their own responsibility. like the classic "they are no ethical consumption user capitalism, thus I can consume whatever I want it's not my fault it's the system. bad system, bad."