becausechemistry

joined 1 year ago
[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago

No, just follow the money. It’s all going into marketing. Ban marketing (like the rest of the world!) and prices drop overnight.

[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago

There is exactly one easiest option: be like the rest of the civilized world and ban consumer marketing of medicine. HUGE amounts of the prices of drugs are just down to TV ads. “Ask your doctor about…” is horse shit, let your doctor decide what prescription drugs you need. And fire the cocaine-riddled, law-breaking marketing departments that soak up so much money.

[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

“Our recipes are consistent, like a good espresso maker.”

“Okay cool, how do you know that?”

“So many questions! We’re hackers! We are very smart.”

[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago

That’s the thing. They have no way of even knowing if they messed up! I’m not even sure the way they could be messing up is a thing they know they should be worried about.

[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I’m not disputing the reasoning behind why this is important. But “it is important” does not imply that their solution is the right one.

[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 18 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

People make illicit drugs chock full of impurities all the time too, and it fucks people up.

There are standards for purity on pharmaceuticals. Impurities have to be ridiculously low. Lower than you can measure in your garage.

These dudes either don’t know you need to even measure purity or have decided that it’s inconvenient and are ignoring it.

[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 43 points 3 weeks ago (38 children)

I’m a process chemist. I do this sort of thing for a living.

These guys don’t even know why what they’re suggesting is so dangerous. Do not do any of this.

[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Unless our ability to cram delta-V into a spacecraft goes way beyond what seems possible now with chemical rockets, a trip to the moon is always gonna involve a few days of coasting through space. That’s always going to take more preparation than a transatlantic flight.

[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 26 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I sort of feel bad about raining on the parade of the person distilling isopropanol in his garage earlier, but it really is dangerous.

But most of us chemists also need to be reminded of it. To the point that someone had to write a paper whose entire point is “don’t distill isopropanol”.

[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Please, don’t do this thing.

[–] becausechemistry@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The issue with isopropanol peroxide formation is that exposing it to air – even when just using it, like when you’re cleaning parts – starts the process. The air in the head space of your containers is also enough to form them over time. You don’t necessarily need to see solids in the containers for it to be dangerous, since they’ll crystallize out as you concentrate the solution during distillation.

It’s also a numbers game. It probably won’t explode the first time you do it. But there’s a chance each time. Do it enough, and you’ll have an incident.

There are chemical reductants that can clear peroxides. For industrial scale isopropanol distillation, I’m not sure what they use. It may be that they just never distill down to the point that peroxides concentrate to a dangerous level.

view more: ‹ prev next ›