bitcrafter

joined 1 year ago
[–] bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 months ago

And even being understaffed and underfunded would at least be understandable, but some of these problems have been caused by the completely unnecessary upgrade of Lemmy to a non-stable branch.

[–] bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, this is a really nice feature; on the couple of rare occasions where an update completely borked things I was able to go from unbootable to everything back up and running in half an hour.

[–] bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 11 months ago

I don't know, I thought it was kind of fun that they mixed things up for a change and had the protagonist be the villain and the central plot be about his triumph over the antagonists who are the heroes; the movie ending with him relaxing and enjoying the sunset now that his great work was over and so he could retire and put down his burdens was a really nice touch.

[–] bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Given their choice of logo, I am advocating for everyone to start referring to it as Twitter/X11.

[–] bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 year ago

Teaching critical thinking has absolutely nothing to do with presupposing the existence of objective truth in political matters.

[–] bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But there are % signs after all the numbers...

[–] bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd be interested in hearing what it is about the language that has gotten you so excited about it.

[–] bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Pretty soon he’ll have so much control over his platform that he can practically cron kings and manipulate outcomes to fit his personal political agenda.

Huh.... do kings normally consist of commands that need to be run on a regular basis at scheduled times?

[–] bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, but what's the end game supposed to be, then? Just making the same request over and over again indefinitely?

[–] bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

One of my current favorite alternative is, "X, the web app you access at twitter.com", though given the logo that they chose I'm tempted to start referring to them as X11.

[–] bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago

The Year of the Lemmy Desktop

[–] bitcrafter@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago

Ok where do I invest my money then?

Well-diversified mutual funds, or something equivalent to that, and in particular you want a mixture of asset classes such as stocks and bonds. You also want to have a hierarchy of investments, ranging from very low-risk but also low-growth investments for your emergency savings that you can tap at a moment's notice to high-risk but also high-growth investments for savings that you do not need to tap for a long time (such as for retirement, assuming that is far off). "High-risk" in this context doesn't mean "risk of your investment disappearing" so much as "risk of your investment suffering from a dip in value at the time when you need it".

But to reiterate: the most important thing here is diversification, because diversification means that some of your investments can drop in value by a lot or even become worthless without causing you to lose everything. Putting all of your money into a single asset or kind of asset, such as a cryptocurrency, is basically the opposite of what you want to be doing.

 

I have a domain name that I own but am not making use of and was thinking of setting up my own personal Lemmy instance, partly so I can have a Lemmy id and instance that I can completely control, partly so that I can contribute directly to my hosting cost, and partly because it might be fun to tinker with (or it might just end up being a pain; I'm still trying to figure out which is the case).

However, from this comment it sounds like, rather than contributing to horizontal scaling and easing the load on other servers, I might actually end up increasing the load on other servers by adding yet another server that the other servers have to talk to in order to keep my server updated on the latest comments and posts to which I am subscribed.

So given this, would self-hosting a personal instance actually make things worse for everyone else and thus be an irresponsible action at this time and/or for the foreseeable future? Because the last thing that I want to do is to inadvertently add a burden to the fediverse!

view more: next ›