capem

joined 7 months ago
[–] capem@startrek.website 2 points 7 months ago

That's okay.

The US has them covered πŸ˜‰πŸ‘

[–] capem@startrek.website 3 points 7 months ago (8 children)

Personally, if I was homeless and found out I'm now in debt from the greedy-fuckers who put me there...

I would just take the law into my own hands at that point.

[–] capem@startrek.website 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

To be fair, even if it did, I could still see it being unconstitutional to the supreme court.

We don't want to admit it, but we kind of weasled our way to ban automatic weapons which is why there is only a "practical" ban instead of an absolute one.

i.e. You can legally own full-auto weapons if you spend the money to do so.

I think it would be very interesting if some right-wingers tried to do something like this but frame it as though you can "only buy handguns/semiautomatics made before a certain date, gotta pay all these fees, etc."

That could force the supreme court to look at whether the original "ban" on automatics is actually constitutional.

[–] capem@startrek.website 4 points 7 months ago

I agree with you wholeheartedly.

[–] capem@startrek.website -2 points 7 months ago (6 children)

He's just gonna be a punk to the gangbangers like in El Salvador before the crackdown.

[–] capem@startrek.website 19 points 7 months ago (6 children)

This will never get past the Supreme Court because it is blatantly unconstitutional.

Nice job wasting money posturing for your base, colorado democrats.

You're just like the grifters in florida.

[–] capem@startrek.website 17 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Tesla single handedly showed an alternative to oil-based vehicles with an absolutely superior machine.

EVs were around before Tesla. Tesla just made them cool because dudebros got suckered into investing in it.

[–] capem@startrek.website 10 points 7 months ago

I'll believe that when rich people get sent to the front lines.

view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί