dino

joined 1 year ago
[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

has no special use case. Its hardened and comparably slower than Net- and FreeBSD

πŸ˜‚

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I have used all 3 major BSDs (Free, Open and Net). FreeBSD is ideal for servers due to its performance. OpenBSD is perfect for security appliances and NetBSD is perfect if you have exotic legacy hardware.

Funny that those descriptions contradict what these Distro actually aim to do. NetBSD is a the supposed performance oriented distro. FreeBSD should be able to do both, desktop and server. But your are on point with OpenBSD.

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 weeks ago

First sane comment here.

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de -5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Using a security focused Distro which has its use case in network devices as a "daily driver" shows that you priorities are "elsewhere".

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I haven't played Dota2 for years, but the toxicity was a reason I stopped. So I am not sure this thing is effective. I know its a tough task, but still I believe that if one developer can have better solutions to this, than it would be Valve.

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I hope you are right, I really like the game and hope they have some interesting fix for toxicitiy and matchmaking.

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

hopefully, I just hope Deadlock doesn't get the Artifact treatment

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

no dotted zeroes = no terminal use

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

they would fit into the Deadlock development, imo

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

COSMIC is Rust, Iced, Smithay, Tiling, customisable, Wayland-only (and thus Wayland-first),

what is iced? i dont care about smithay, why should I? customisable as a feature? ever DE is except Gnome, I guess?

[–] dino@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

Also, create a settings GUI. This isn’t the 1960s.

rofl

55
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by dino@discuss.tchncs.de to c/gaming@beehaw.org
 

So yeah, I want to discuss or point out why I think Valve needs to fix Anti-Cheat issues. They have VAC but apparently its doing jackshit, be it Counter Strike 2 (any previous iterations) or something like Hunt: Showdown the prevalence of cheating players is non deniable. For me personally it has come to a point that I am not enjoying playing those games anymore, although they are great games by itself. But the amount of occurrences being killed or playing against cheaters is at a height, where I don't see the point anymore.

  • Why I think Valve is the only company able to something against cheaters?

Because they have the tools with VAC already aiming to prevent cheaters. Valve has got the resources to actually invest into something more profound which could be used for any game where anti-cheat protection needs to be implemented. And lastly Valve is the company which is interested in furthering the ability to gaming on Linux, the anti-cheat solution needs to work on both operating systems. Only Valve has the motivation and means to achieve that with their knowledge and resources. What do you guys think about the topic? Is the fight against cheaters hopeless? Do you think some other entity should provide anti-cheat protection, why? I skimmed over "anti cheat in linux kernel" posts in the net, but I have very little knowledge about the topic, what is your stance on it?

Edited: Mixed EAC with VAC. EAC seems to be part of Epic Company. Both of these tools seem unable to prevent cheating like mentioned above.

view more: next β€Ί