docrobot

joined 1 year ago
[–] docrobot@lemmy.sdf.org 61 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Am I the only one that remembers the "cut the cord" and "stop feeding the cable pig" nonsense? What happened to all that? Thankfully, none of this has affected me, then or now. I don't usually bother with "programming" of any kind but, when I do, "arr mateys."

[–] docrobot@lemmy.sdf.org 31 points 1 year ago

Why are we excited about closed source Chromium garbage?

[–] docrobot@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 year ago

Of course they're counting "CSAM-like" in the stats, otherwise they wouldn't have any stats at all. In any case, they don't really care about child abuse at all. They care about a platform existing that they haven't been able to wrap their slimy tentacles around yet.

[–] docrobot@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I'm not actually going to read all that, but I'm going to take a few guesses that I'm quite sure are going to be correct.

First, I don't think Mastodon has a "massive child abuse material" problem at all. I think it has, at best, a "racy Japanese style cartoon drawing" problem or, at worst, an "AI generated smut meant to look underage" problem. I'm also quite sure there are monsters operating in the shadows, dogwhistling and hashtagging to each other to find like minded people to set up private exchanges (or instances) for actual CSAM. This is no different than any other platform on the Internet, Mastodon or not. This is no different than the golden age of IRC. This is no different from Tor. This is no different than the USENET and BBS days. People use computers for nefarious shit.

All that having been said, I'm equally sure that this "research" claims that some algorithm has found "actual child porn" on Mastodon that has been verified by some "trusted third part(y|ies)" that may or may not be named. I'm also sure this "research" spends an inordinate amount of time pointing out the "shortcomings" of Mastodon (i.e. no built-in "features" that would allow corporations/governments to conduct what is essentially dragnet surveillance on traffic) and how this has to change "for the safety of the children."

How right was I?

[–] docrobot@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] docrobot@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

alias weather='curl wttr.in'

[–] docrobot@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago

They really want the fediverse to grow. I appreciate their dedication to the cause.