Nah,
That continues to be a waste of time.
Later loser
Nah,
That continues to be a waste of time.
Later loser
🙄, sure. That's what you've been doing.
More like sophisticated terrorist attack tools used
And a reply like this is why I'd never believe you'd question it in good faith. Cause you say, i dunno about the issue or the circumstances, but it's not genocide.
You don't look, you just say you have a problem with what others say about a topic you admit you don't know about.
Go find out or listen to what others have to say
Honestly @dragonfucker@lemmy.nz below sums it up. Almost everyone from the region calls it genocide (with the exclusion of some Israelis)
Now you bring up what America did in ww2. And yeah, that actually constitutes a warcrime. But when the Japanese surrendered, that was accepted and people moved on. Here, they reached settlement and then Israel assassinated the leader they reached the ceasefire agreement with.
It's pretty clear at this point what's happening and that it needs to stop.
Nobody expects Kamala to solve it. They do expect her to stop supporting genocide.
Most serious injury/death happens at higher speeds. Lower speeds, increased safety.
No, safety had more to it than less deaths. If we have less deaths but many many more crippling injuries, that's not better.
They also happen due to distracted drivers, which is not a problem for computers.
Congested and slow traffic seems to confuse self driving the most tbh.
They absolutely do not.
76% of commuters drive alone
Commuters don't take cabs. We're talking about cabs.
How do you figure that?
Most accidents occur at low speeds. More traffic, lower speeds.
Don't know how you figure any of that either. It has an enormous amount of storage. And this could theoretically be not just a taxi but a replacement for your car altogether.
Most people don't travel alone but in groups of 3 or more.
It's supposed to make transport safe and more accessible
It's going to do neither of these things either. Claims that it would are kind of insane. More traffic means more time at risk and more cost when it comes to cabs.
It only has 2 seats because cars are only occupied by more than 2 people like 10% of the time
Butt one of the biggest use for cars is going to the airport with luggage and/or going out with friends on evenings to get drunk.. neither of which this is suited for.
So while the author "missed the point", your evaluation of use cases for this greatly misses the point too.
Not if isn't connected to a network. 😈
Yeah but not all consumption is equal. And when musk is an accelerations... that's probably worse
I have yet to meet a Trump supporter who is a real person. I'm convinced they're brain worms ina meat suit